31
Andrey Solomatin
Last seen 1 year ago
Member for 11 years, 2 months, 11 days
Difficulty Normal
Oct. 9, 2016, 10:32 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment bodonferenc: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: Some notes about style: no need parenthesis and you miss space after coma return ",".join(phrases).r... |
Oct. 8, 2016, 12:05 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution euginm: 1 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
Oct. 7, 2016, 7:13 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution tatsu115: 1 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
Oct. 3, 2016, 11:46 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution GiForce: 2 on First-Cjkjvfnby |
Oct. 1, 2016, 9:01 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution lorenfar: 2 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
Oct. 1, 2016, 2:30 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment Mellivoran: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: Comment is not so good |
Sept. 30, 2016, 10:11 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment vladimir.v.matievskij: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: Set -1 because **len(array) == 0** PEP8: For sequences, (strings, lists, tuples), use the fact that ... |
Sept. 29, 2016, 1:41 p.m. | -2 | Experience for voted solution akhripko: -2 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
Sept. 29, 2016, 8:43 a.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution strump: 3 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
Sept. 28, 2016, 6:03 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution ptillemans: 1 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
Sept. 27, 2016, 4:44 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment jstrzebonski: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: Set -1 because **len(array) == 0** PEP8: For sequences, (strings, lists, tuples), use the fact that ... |
Sept. 27, 2016, 4:40 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment jstrzebonski: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: Iterate over sequence and collect sum. https://docs.python.org/2/library/itertools.html#itertools.is... |
Sept. 25, 2016, 10:53 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution oduvan: 2 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
Sept. 22, 2016, 1:50 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Thenbacker: 1 on little compex-Cjkjvfnby |
Sept. 21, 2016, 4:20 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Ubscaho: 1 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
Sept. 19, 2016, 5:42 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment oduvan: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: readability vs optimization. IMHO in most cases readability wins |
Sept. 19, 2016, 5:42 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment oduvan: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: Say no to copy-paste. |
Sept. 19, 2016, 5:36 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment oduvan: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: You can move common code from max and min to separate function. |
Sept. 19, 2016, 5:36 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment oduvan: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: You can move common code from max and min to separate function. |
Sept. 19, 2016, 5:34 p.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution oduvan: 3 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
Sept. 18, 2016, 2:26 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution etiology: 1 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
Sept. 17, 2016, 6:13 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution flyingptman: 2 on simple-Cjkjvfnby |
Sept. 15, 2016, 8:26 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution vkhandus: 2 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
Sept. 15, 2016, 6:18 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution MPython: 2 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
Sept. 14, 2016, 11:14 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution AlexanderShein: 2 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
Sept. 12, 2016, 12:25 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment oduvan: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: You can use tuple of tuples instead dict **elements = ((1000 : 'M'), ...)** to avoid sort. |
Sept. 12, 2016, 12:25 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment oduvan: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: You can use tuple of tuples instead dict **elements = ((1000 : 'M'), ...)** to avoid sort. |
Sept. 12, 2016, 2:21 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment Mellivoran: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: Set -1 because **len(array) == 0** PEP8: For sequences, (strings, lists, tuples), use the fact that ... |
Sept. 11, 2016, 1:42 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment neulaender: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: You can use tuple of tuples instead dict **elements = ((1000 : 'M'), ...)** to avoid sort. |
Sept. 11, 2016, 1:42 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment neulaender: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: You can use tuple of tuples instead dict **elements = ((1000 : 'M'), ...)** to avoid sort. |
Sept. 11, 2016, 7:11 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment maxrake: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: It can be more cute and clever with string format: return eval('%c%c%c(%s)' % (115, 117, 109, x)) |
Sept. 9, 2016, 3:22 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution jwu: 1 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
Aug. 30, 2016, 3:43 p.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution han97: 4 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
Aug. 28, 2016, 5:43 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution jelaris8: 1 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
Aug. 26, 2016, 6:51 p.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution MagicMantis: 4 on reduce-Cjkjvfnby |
Aug. 16, 2016, 11:40 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment han97: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: I got your idea. You prefer to write code instead of use library function. For one side it more flex... |
Aug. 13, 2016, 10:16 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution VladBark: 2 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
Aug. 13, 2016, 11:40 a.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution Elpicsida: 4 on recursion-Cjkjvfnby |
July 28, 2016, 10:07 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution tivvit: 1 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
July 17, 2016, 11:50 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment Airtrixxx1080: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: You don't need **r** variable, you can return instead. |
July 2, 2016, 11:49 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution pbstojkov: 1 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
June 29, 2016, 10:46 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution max.voitko: 1 on operators-Cjkjvfnby |
June 28, 2016, 9:24 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution frenchtoast: 1 on simple cycle-Cjkjvfnby |
June 26, 2016, 8:24 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment msmyxz: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: Set -1 because **len(array) == 0** PEP8: For sequences, (strings, lists, tuples), use the fact that ... |
June 24, 2016, 11:42 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution anciksfg_c2ed88e2be9b4667ac53e: 2 on reduce-Cjkjvfnby |
June 20, 2016, 6:21 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution pinto.faa: 1 on generator-Cjkjvfnby |
June 19, 2016, 10:35 a.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution jeandupont: 4 on simple-Cjkjvfnby |
June 13, 2016, 12:34 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution butko.j.m: 1 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
June 3, 2016, 5:42 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution jonmor75: 1 on recursion-Cjkjvfnby |
May 31, 2016, 6:27 a.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution ljy95135: 4 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
May 27, 2016, 11:57 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution goncharuk.igor.v: 2 on reduce-Cjkjvfnby |
May 24, 2016, 9:05 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution ljy95135: 2 on operators-Cjkjvfnby |
May 23, 2016, 12:33 p.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution saklar13: 3 on intersection-Cjkjvfnby |
May 23, 2016, 11:34 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution saharnasiri71: 2 on recursion-Cjkjvfnby |
May 22, 2016, 7:24 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution rogalicue: 2 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
May 21, 2016, 1:20 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution gkyy20: 2 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
May 21, 2016, 11:27 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Flying_Eye: 1 on recursion-Cjkjvfnby |
May 20, 2016, 7:41 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution bebbet: 1 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
May 17, 2016, 10:21 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution kubarik: 2 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
May 17, 2016, 7:45 a.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution afkalin: 3 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
May 14, 2016, 2:31 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution xaoc94: 1 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
May 13, 2016, 11:43 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment Flying_Eye: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: Why you put this to "Speedy" category? |
May 9, 2016, 12:44 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment Flying_Eye: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: **el for el in array[::2]** is same as **array[::2]** |
May 8, 2016, 11:28 a.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution Agrigor: 3 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
May 7, 2016, 12:35 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Flying_Eye: 1 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
May 7, 2016, 8:38 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution masashi.kureishi: 1 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
May 4, 2016, 8:42 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution silverspringn81: 1 on sorted-Cjkjvfnby |
May 2, 2016, 6:03 p.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution Timofei13: 3 on reduce-Cjkjvfnby |
May 1, 2016, 11:36 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment kummera: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: Making own implementation for standard library functions is not clear. Using standard library functi... |
April 27, 2016, 7:47 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Aunmag: 1 on generator-Cjkjvfnby |
April 22, 2016, 8:35 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution Aunmag: 2 on simple-Cjkjvfnby |
April 19, 2016, 9:08 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment hezhe88: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: I down vote this solution because you use **fs += [str(p)]** instead of **fs.append(str(p))**. **boo... |
April 18, 2016, 7:23 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution AlexLogin: 1 on EAFP-Cjkjvfnby |
April 14, 2016, 2:07 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution sbccdx007: 1 on simple-Cjkjvfnby |
April 13, 2016, 1:45 p.m. | +8 | Experience for voted solution BoomGoesThe: 4 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
April 12, 2016, 7:19 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution narimiran: 1 on First-Cjkjvfnby |
April 12, 2016, 5:46 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution spz: 1 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
April 12, 2016, 2:32 p.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution BoomGoesThe: 4 on py3 unpack-Cjkjvfnby |
April 12, 2016, 12:03 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution narumi.kano.3: 1 on little compex-Cjkjvfnby |
April 12, 2016, 10:21 a.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution narimiran: 2 on py3 unpack-Cjkjvfnby |
April 10, 2016, 4:11 a.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution BoomGoesThe: 3 on simple-Cjkjvfnby |
April 9, 2016, 7:41 a.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution narimiran: 1 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
April 8, 2016, 4:51 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution izzymat1102: 1 on EAFP-Cjkjvfnby |
April 8, 2016, 12:33 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution narimiran: 2 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
April 8, 2016, 11:07 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution ookohsk: 1 on simple-Cjkjvfnby |
April 7, 2016, 8:01 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment afana_daniel: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: Set -1 because **len(array) == 0** PEP8: For sequences, (strings, lists, tuples), use the fact that ... |
April 6, 2016, 8:31 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution asusnjara: 1 on First-Cjkjvfnby |
April 6, 2016, 6:49 p.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution narimiran: 1 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
April 5, 2016, 2:13 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution laetrid: 2 on recursion-Cjkjvfnby |
April 5, 2016, 11:33 a.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution Kiseloff: 1 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
April 4, 2016, 9:28 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution laetrid: 1 on operators-Cjkjvfnby |
April 4, 2016, 8:43 p.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution Alkaline: 4 on simple-Cjkjvfnby |
April 3, 2016, 8:04 p.m. | +17 | Experience for voted solution Alkaline: 3 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
April 3, 2016, 5:58 p.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution narimiran: 1 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
April 2, 2016, 11:41 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment suic: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: PEP8: For sequences, (strings, lists, tuples), use the fact that empty sequences are false. Yes: if ... |
April 2, 2016, 1:01 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution murray2k: 1 on deque-Cjkjvfnby |
April 1, 2016, 10:06 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution PaulBrunko: 1 on switch-Cjkjvfnby |
April 1, 2016, 9:47 a.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution Alkaline: 3 on First-Cjkjvfnby |
March 31, 2016, 10:32 a.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution williamjoy: 1 on __-Cjkjvfnby |
March 31, 2016, 8:22 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment oduvan: 1 on Cjkjvfnby: It updates itself, just need to wait some time. |