Aug. 25, 2017, 7:23 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
StefanPochmann: Just shortened the third line a bit (required changing the characters): checkio=lambda i,r=range:int...
|
Jan. 9, 2017, 9:51 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Paul-Yuchao-Dong: I knew it! I knew there must be a better way! I'm surprised there isn't something like this in the s...
|
Oct. 25, 2016, 7:19 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Thenbacker: Interesting solution, I wouldn't have thought to use a stack for this problem.
|
Oct. 18, 2016, 9:05 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: If it didn't have so much repetition, you'd get more thumbs. :-)
|
Sept. 12, 2016, 8:54 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: Nice BFSolution. :-) Here are a few suggestions: list.pop(0) performance is much weaker than it need...
|
July 11, 2016, 10:46 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Blastus: Excellent job on your solution to this challenge! You have good documentation, and there are only tw...
|
April 11, 2016, 1:31 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
aziz199505: Hold My Beer I can do this easy xD JK. Very Cool!
|
April 6, 2016, 10:26 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
diegueus9: whhaaaattttt, nice solution, is anything but clear.
|
March 29, 2016, 3:14 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: `~bin` makes a very strong false association in my brain. :-D
|
March 29, 2016, 2:29 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: Wow, you put a lion in Cairo, _and_ a tiger at the Cape of Good Hope. :-DD ([reference](http://www.c...
|
July 20, 2015, 9:24 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
maxrake: Creative and simple...nice work!
|
May 12, 2015, 10:09 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
mlb00: i like the tn[-1] < n expression! very clever! I solved mine in 21 lines and yours is still very cle...
|
April 27, 2015, 8:21 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
StefanPochmann: You can shorten it a bit by using `sum(a[:1])` and `c[0]>'PF'`: digit_stack=d=lambda c,a=[]:len(c)an...
|
Feb. 4, 2015, 7:36 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
nickie: A brilliantly short solution (a bit obfuscated here, for obvious reasons). Horrible, from a graph th...
|
Jan. 7, 2015, 11:01 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: Yup, that's the one. If elements of r are only pairs, it's simplest. Though it seems not the shortes...
|
Nov. 23, 2014, 9:06 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
silencer: I didn't know -True trick. Cool.
|
Jan. 31, 2014, 7:53 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
tristan.heuer_08da40cd57a343db: It breaks if you test 0 or 1. Otherwise nice and elegant solution.
|