Sept. 18, 2018, 10:54 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
ural_gorets: Nice decision with loop :)
|
Sept. 17, 2018, 5:35 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Merzix: This information can be useful to everyone, not just the Russian.
|
Sept. 17, 2018, 5 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Phil15: It's still simple (or at least simple as checkio simple tasks ^^).
|
Sept. 17, 2018, 4:20 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
przemyslaw.daniel: I can fully undertsand your frustration because it was the same in my case. Almost all tasks on this...
|
Sept. 17, 2018, 5:38 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Oleg_Domokeev: I like this clear solution. Thank you. One can easy understand the logic of algorithm: for every pai...
|
Sept. 16, 2018, 6:49 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Merzix: Our cycles are different. I choose the lines that contain '#', you strip lines that not contain '#' ...
|
Sept. 15, 2018, 4:44 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: Two points. First, technologies that have been with us for such a long time don't really have a sing...
|
Sept. 13, 2018, 5:18 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
przemyslaw.daniel: It seems that these kind of solutions won't work with cases like this wild_dogs([(1,1),(1,2),(2,1),(...
|
Sept. 10, 2018, 9:07 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Phil15: I will have used math.inf instead of 1e10 (or split into 2 cases), and 0 instead of 1e-6 (so r==int(...
|
Sept. 10, 2018, 6:51 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
likewind: I hope now all mistakes are fixed)
|
Sept. 10, 2018, 6:32 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
kurosawa4434: Extra 7: wild_dogs([[6,-0.5],[3,-5],[1,-20]]) == 5.27 3.63 is correct? I attached the image that is ...
|
Sept. 9, 2018, 5:57 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
likewind: Thank you all for the useful info. This mission really has some trouble with test cases. They will b...
|
Sept. 9, 2018, 2:21 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
przemyslaw.daniel: You recognize Solmyr! My obeisances
|
July 29, 2018, 9:58 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
s1337: That is awesome and thank you! No more copy & paste. Checkio was my favourite programming page, but ...
|
July 27, 2018, 9:44 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
oleozy: 1. one call subj.lower() vs letter.lower() for each letter 2. one join vs += for each letter 3. one ...
|
July 24, 2018, 10:15 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
oduvan: Hi Aleksei, Thanks for the feedback. I random review you are trying to much active users and your co...
|
July 11, 2018, 4:13 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
von.Oak: Smart using numpy. On the other side, it is approximately 2x slower than a classic solution without ...
|
July 11, 2018, 4:10 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
von.Oak: Hello, it's not so effective if you make 3x `sorted` on `data`. It's better to sort only once and th...
|
June 29, 2018, 9:26 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
grutte_pier: Since you have the math skills to derive the equation, I really don't understand why you didn't just...
|
June 29, 2018, 7:08 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
kuzdras: At first it seems complicated but it's really clear and description is very good. You took interesti...
|
June 26, 2018, 3:26 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
suic: This blog post and the discussion under it reminds me [this video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E...
|
June 20, 2018, 10:55 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
suic: Hi, 1. Don't comment obvious things. It's not useful. 2. All that "magic" with `Counter.most_common`...
|
June 19, 2018, 6:17 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
andreff73: There is no need to use strip() method after split(). Because there are no leading and trailing spac...
|
June 18, 2018, 4:19 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
oduvan: I believe with missions with using Class we should have a low starting point, so people can grow the...
|
June 17, 2018, 7:18 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Cjkjvfnby: http://www.checkio.org/forum/post/1618/proper-way-to-check-if-sequence-is-empty/
|
June 16, 2018, 12:03 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: It's interesting that the continuous case is simpler (and much more practiced at school)... if you s...
|
June 16, 2018, 10:46 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: It's a fine solution for small enough inputs. Of course, for bigger inputs, you'll have to deal with...
|
June 7, 2018, 6:40 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
suic: Thanks for asking. I've changed my job, switched to Python at work and moved to a different country ...
|
May 23, 2018, 12:41 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
alexander.gorelyshev: Well, they both return a new `str` object; `str.upper` method maps all characters to their correspon...
|
May 13, 2018, 12:59 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
suic: Hi, the use of `%` is nice but this solution is very inefficient as `str` is immutable and the follo...
|
May 7, 2018, 9:13 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: Yes, it "works". And then you write something a bit bigger, and it executes too long, and you press ...
|
May 2, 2018, 12:01 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
alexander.gorelyshev: Clear, clever and simple. My only suggestion is to check instead for `letter.isalpha()` and just ret...
|
April 28, 2018, 2:42 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
hanpari: But a little bit unreadable, don't you think? :) (At least for Clear category.)
|