June 19, 2015, 6:30 p.m. |
+ 2 |
for
Shoooooooooort. :)-hrvoje
|
June 15, 2015, 3:04 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
hrvoje: Well, this was unexpected. And awesome! :)
|
June 11, 2015, 7:59 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
artemrudenko: From the stackoverflow and some python speed tips and trics is not a good way to shift list right us...
|
June 5, 2015, 6:05 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Mycroft0121: wow
|
June 2, 2015, 4:14 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
taras-sereda: thanks. In essence it's not the matter of time execution. It's more for understanding what leads to ...
|
May 28, 2015, 11:13 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for
First - lambdas-kryksyh
|
May 27, 2015, 7:22 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Luke123: I like the solution, this is the best part of Checkio, to learn think in new ways. First i solved th...
|
May 22, 2015, 10:52 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
numenor96_a1a2b7b06d624327a506: I understand, you're doing a great job here, you have earned the right to be arrogant) I think many ...
|
May 22, 2015, 6:24 a.m. |
+ 2 |
for
First: predefined squares-shota243
|
May 21, 2015, 12:37 p.m. |
+ 2 |
for
First of The square chest-grigoriytretyakov
|
May 19, 2015, 10:14 a.m. |
+ 2 |
for
Clear one liner-jrebane
|
May 12, 2015, 5:10 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for
First-psyll89_25c063f0ff5c4a51877a68
|
May 12, 2015, 5:10 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for
First-psyll89_25c063f0ff5c4a51877a68
|
May 11, 2015, 5:19 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
StefanPochmann: I just googled that string and the year. Checking again now, I see that the string alone would've su...
|
May 11, 2015, 5:17 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
StefanPochmann: I see what you did there.
|
May 11, 2015, 1:33 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for
I'm sure you'll agree-StefanPochmann
|
May 11, 2015, 8:49 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
StefanPochmann: In Python 3.4 I'd make `[]` the max-default.
|
May 11, 2015, 8:49 a.m. |
+ 2 |
for
Generator Fun-StefanPochmann
|
May 9, 2015, 4:36 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
StefanPochmann: Your final Counter-solution does `ch.lower()`, but `ch` comes from an already `lower`ed string. And ...
|
May 7, 2015, 5:34 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
suic: ad VS: Because I have to... :-/ The code I'm working on is, let's say, not manageable without _Intel...
|
May 6, 2015, 3:32 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
hanpari: Idle is great and fast. I tried PyCharm but before it is loaded you can make some tee :) And all my ...
|
May 6, 2015, 9:42 a.m. |
+ 4 |
for
vek-StefanPochmann
|
May 6, 2015, 7:30 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
StefanPochmann: Unfortunately I looked at veky's solution before thinking much, so I can't claim this as my own. I m...
|
May 6, 2015, 6:26 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
abe.dillon: I'm going to try to be brief because I never meant such a small nit-pick to turn into such a debate....
|
May 6, 2015, 6:23 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
abe.dillon: >' is not text encloser in English, right? It is, but it's usually better to use " whenever possible...
|
May 5, 2015, 1:19 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
gyahun_dash: Thank you. I introduce [more awesome answer](http://www.checkio.org/mission/bird-language/publicatio...
|
May 4, 2015, 11:24 p.m. |
+ 3 |
for
64-StefanPochmann
|
May 4, 2015, 11:23 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
StefanPochmann: Note that `*` binds stronger than `in`, so the `*` is not your typical simple `and` replacement betw...
|
May 4, 2015, 11:21 p.m. |
+ 3 |
for
Short, Simple, Efficient, Clear-StefanPochmann
|
May 4, 2015, 9:14 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
frbls: Oh, that is good to know. It looks like in was implementation defined until python 3.
|
May 4, 2015, 9:14 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
springulum: holy crap this is short
|
May 1, 2015, 5:14 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
stclair.daniel_f70a54fff4764c4: Well, that's certainly a lot shorter than mine! :)
|
April 30, 2015, 5:08 a.m. |
+ 3 |
for
Third-astynax84
|
April 27, 2015, 5:55 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
StefanPochmann: Ah yes, I've seen that. Very nice one.
|
April 26, 2015, 10:55 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
StefanPochmann: His days were numbered.
|
April 26, 2015, 10:39 p.m. |
+ 4 |
for
78-StefanPochmann
|
April 26, 2015, 6:43 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
StefanPochmann: This really is fast. I compared it with [ale1ster's "Regexes all the way"](http://www.checkio.org/mi...
|
April 26, 2015, 11:48 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
StefanPochmann: Ok, makes sense. Most of the time I don't explain, either, there I mostly did because those expressi...
|
April 25, 2015, 10:21 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
StefanPochmann: > Best thing since sliced method names? [Sliced "Fizz Buzz"](http://www.checkio.org/mission/fizz-buz...
|
April 25, 2015, 10:21 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
StefanPochmann: Took me forever to find those index expressions. My progression was: checkio=lambda n:'Fizz Buzz'[(n...
|
April 25, 2015, 10:16 p.m. |
+ 3 |
for
Second-isisbinder
|
April 24, 2015, 4:20 a.m. |
+ 4 |
for
veky + DiZ + Stefan-StefanPochmann
|
April 22, 2015, 3:34 p.m. |
+ 4 |
for
Shortest?-DiZ
|
April 22, 2015, 11:15 a.m. |
+ 3 |
for
str-DiZ
|
April 21, 2015, 9:17 p.m. |
+ 5 |
for
Shortest? (54)-StefanPochmann
|
April 21, 2015, 3:24 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
drobotnik: Cheers, thanks for the advice!
|
April 21, 2015, 3 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Peter.White: > Lambda is (delayed) expression with holes. Ahh, now I get it. Now I have a mental image I can work...
|
April 21, 2015, 3:17 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
bryukh: I want this too :-)
|
April 20, 2015, 6:15 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
mauricioabreu: Of course this solution is a "hack". You did well! :-)
|
April 17, 2015, 4:47 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
bryukh: ...and I should return this mission back :-)
|
April 16, 2015, 7:21 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
kryksyh: 50 shades of python...
|
April 16, 2015, 12:35 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
drobotnik: lol, I get it now :) Maybe its time to do some real work now...... Time for one more puzzle though, ...
|
April 15, 2015, 2:01 p.m. |
+ 4 |
for
Short fast non-recursive lambda-StefanPochmann
|
April 15, 2015, 7:38 a.m. |
+ 3 |
for
Short, fast, recursive-StefanPochmann
|
April 14, 2015, 7:58 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
suic: Whatabout: Veky is an algorithm (or machine) turning šlivovica into Python code? :D (When I read the...
|
April 13, 2015, 9:53 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
kryksyh: Oh, so sorry for ruining this..
|
April 13, 2015, 9:52 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Timon666: Yeap, these days do it almost all the time ;)
|
April 12, 2015, 10:11 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
mdmss37: Thanks veky, I don't pay much attention when I name variables. I will try to stop and think again, b...
|
April 10, 2015, 7:02 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
bryukh: > BTW have you seen my "determinant" solution?:) It breaks my brain again. It's too much for one day...
|
April 8, 2015, 4:13 p.m. |
+ 3 |
for
Third-gyahun_dash
|
April 4, 2015, 2:36 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
taras-sereda: Nevertheless thanks for nitpicks :) It helps to solidify knowledge.
|
April 3, 2015, 5:02 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Peter.White: How do you not get headaches when writing something like this? I get them just from _reading_ it. ;)
|
April 3, 2015, 4:36 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Peter.White: Too late, I have looked. ;) I think I never would have guessed that, but I see how it works now. I a...
|
April 2, 2015, 6:16 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Peter.White: Lol, I also had the idea to use a dictionary and enumeration. But somehow it didn't cross my mind to...
|
April 2, 2015, 2:15 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
iafilatov: Hey, I've been mentioned :) Anyway, I haven't been here for a while, so maybe I'm out of context. An...
|
April 2, 2015, 1:54 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
taras-sereda: Hi, thanks for the comment. Regarding max with key. I've seen the solution using this approach just ...
|
April 1, 2015, 1:58 p.m. |
+ 4 |
for
DP-gyahun_dash
|
March 30, 2015, 7:54 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
psystyle: I'm dazzled by the simplicity of this solution. Very clean!
|
March 22, 2015, 11:50 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
walkingpendulum: Thank you, now I read the task one more time :D
|
March 22, 2015, 12:20 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for
First-walkingpendulum
|
March 22, 2015, 12:19 p.m. |
+ 3 |
for
First-walkingpendulum
|
March 22, 2015, 12:18 p.m. |
+ 2 |
for
First-walkingpendulum
|
March 22, 2015, 12:14 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for
First-walkingpendulum
|
March 21, 2015, 6:14 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
mlb00: very cool to know, thanks!
|
March 20, 2015, 5:38 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
kvas: I think there are two sides to it. I'd expect people to use a reasonably efficient algorithm and rea...
|
March 20, 2015, 5:33 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
DiZ: I admit that a multiplicative constant, especially so small, is completely negligible for memory use...
|
March 19, 2015, 2:13 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Cjkjvfnby: > And what would happen if it weren't there? double max
|
March 17, 2015, 5:24 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for
Non-recursive and resetting-juzzuj
|
March 17, 2015, 5:08 a.m. |
+ 2 |
for
First-juzzuj
|
March 17, 2015, 4:57 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for
First-juzzuj
|
March 14, 2015, 6:30 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
jkibbe: Thanks for providing some insight into your thinking process. I always enjoy checking out your solut...
|
March 14, 2015, 3:19 p.m. |
+ 4 |
for
Sum of chr-DiZ
|
March 13, 2015, 10:58 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
DiZ: And have generated an infinite loop.. :P
|
March 13, 2015, 12:25 p.m. |
+ 3 |
for
Second-shiracamus
|
March 13, 2015, 6:02 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
hanpari: I have to admit in public there are only two names for me related to Python: Guido and Veky. Not nec...
|
March 9, 2015, 6:43 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
bryukh: Yeah, we had the idea to call it Veking :-)
|
March 6, 2015, 12:24 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Lijantropique: Yep it was clear. I just wanted to thank you for taking the time of writing such explanations. I kno...
|
March 4, 2015, 11:38 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
zlomovsky: /me shrugs his shoulders.
|
March 3, 2015, 8:26 a.m. |
+ 2 |
for
My Star Wars-zlomovsky
|
March 3, 2015, 8:25 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
zlomovsky: Thank you very much for this awesome idea! I've created the "[Star Wars](http://www.checkio.org/miss...
|
March 2, 2015, 8:22 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
nkapliev: You can push string value. And convert to int only when you need that - in pop or peek operation. Be...
|
March 2, 2015, 7:17 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
SantiagoSaid: At first i was a bit lost with this conversation, but then discovered the correct meaning!! great co...
|
March 2, 2015, 2 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
DiZ: There is still shorter ;) from itertools import*;break_rings=lambda r:min(map(len,map(set,product(*r...
|
March 2, 2015, 1:55 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
busthehero_28e07718e67f4c8fbb7: Very concise!
|
Feb. 27, 2015, 4:29 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Sim0000: Thank you for good description :-)
|
Feb. 25, 2015, 8:58 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
bukebuer: It's a joke rather than an accusation. :-)
|
Feb. 24, 2015, 9:10 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
SandeepManilal: Good stuff! its so clean.
|
Feb. 22, 2015, 10:51 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Winandfx: i've opened Wiki and it says that Borromean rings are a special case of a Brunnian link with 3 rings...
|
Feb. 22, 2015, 10:05 p.m. |
+ 2 |
for
First-suic
|
Feb. 22, 2015, 7:49 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
grutte_pier: Nowadays it seems the first hit you get is to the European Association of Faculties of Pharmacy :D S...
|