57
Awesome Team
Vedran Čačić
https://web.math.hr/~veky
Last seen 17 hours ago
Member for 11 years, 6 months, 6 days
Difficulty Advanced
We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time.
Nov. 20, 2015, 2:55 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution omegabyte31: 1 on Stack-veky |
Nov. 20, 2015, 8:58 a.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution xiaozhan: 4 on Obvious-veky |
Nov. 19, 2015, 2:13 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution NicoF: 1 on Stack-veky |
Nov. 19, 2015, 11:59 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment omegabyte31: 1 on veky: Not only builtin function. Any callable can go there. class BySign(int): def __lt__(self, other): x,... |
Nov. 19, 2015, 11:37 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution omegabyte31: 1 on Hinted-veky |
Nov. 19, 2015, 9:32 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution Pouf: 2 on Obvious-veky |
Nov. 19, 2015, 6:13 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment yun_zynb: 1 on veky: 3) True is true, but not everything true is True. See [this comment](http://www.checkio.org/mission/... |
Nov. 18, 2015, 9:36 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution buddyfeagles: 1 on Batteries-veky |
Nov. 18, 2015, 9:35 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution usdaproved: 2 on Radical-veky |
Nov. 18, 2015, 8:50 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution k4ju: 1 on Magnum opus-veky |
Nov. 18, 2015, 4 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution romashka103: 1 on filter-veky |
Nov. 18, 2015, 3:42 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution Dimavasilevski: 2 on Finite-veky |
Nov. 18, 2015, 1 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution jewelsmu: 1 on Hinted-veky |
Nov. 18, 2015, 12:20 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution fedrP: 1 on for else-veky |
Nov. 18, 2015, noon | +1 | Experience for voted solution jewelsmu: 1 on Hinted-veky |
Nov. 18, 2015, 11:42 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment hanpari: 1 on veky: The whole point of // is that you can ignore the remainder. So you don't need -1 in line 5. :-) And ... |
Nov. 18, 2015, 9:02 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: You're reading too much into it. Go, look at official text of [PEP#20](https://www.python.org/dev/pe... |
Nov. 18, 2015, 7:13 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Seter: 1 on Indexcept-veky |
Nov. 18, 2015, 6:26 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: Thanks, you're the first to congratulate me. :-) Here is a nice trivia about that number: do you kno... |
Nov. 18, 2015, 6:26 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: Cool idea. ;-) |
Nov. 18, 2015, 6:26 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: No, that trivia is not explicitly[:-P] related to your solution. It's related to your congratulation... |
Nov. 18, 2015, 5:56 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: Yes, just reversing place values (`18**0` and `18**1`) would do the trick (of removing string revers... |
Nov. 18, 2015, 5:56 a.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: Yes, just reversing place values (`18**0` and `18**1`) would do the trick (of removing string revers... |
Nov. 18, 2015, 4:11 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment hezhe88: 1 on veky: Nice way of avoiding coding the alphabet in. :-) |
Nov. 18, 2015, 2:59 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution nanpa: 1 on Using +-veky |
Nov. 18, 2015, 2:03 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: Wow! Very original. :-) Just a few nitpicks: * please, no space before lambda's colon. * `any` accep... |
Nov. 18, 2015, 2:03 a.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: Wow! Very original. :-) Just a few nitpicks: * please, no space before lambda's colon. * `any` accep... |
Nov. 17, 2015, 10:35 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution ferenckovacsx: 1 on ~Shortest-veky |
Nov. 17, 2015, 4:28 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution Dimavasilevski: 2 on Hinted-veky |
Nov. 17, 2015, 3:42 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution vrovachev: 2 on Finite-veky |
Nov. 17, 2015, 2:41 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution sajkatav: 2 on Hinted-veky |
Nov. 17, 2015, 2:07 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution nanpa: 1 on Double ended-veky |
Nov. 17, 2015, 1:59 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution yun_zynb: 1 on Both sides-veky |
Nov. 17, 2015, 1:46 p.m. | -1 | Experience for voted comment Zulf: -1 on veky: I'm sorry about that. What's your question exactly? "Why not use a def"? 1. Can you answer the quest... |
Nov. 17, 2015, 8:45 a.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution xiaozhan: 3 on o, safe pawns...-veky |
Nov. 17, 2015, 8:43 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution ducthinhdt: 2 on Hinted-veky |
Nov. 16, 2015, 10:56 p.m. | +5 | Experience for voted solution hezhe88: 3 on Again-veky |
Nov. 16, 2015, 10:38 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution AndriiP: 1 on smn theorem-veky |
Nov. 16, 2015, 9:38 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution SergeyEremeykin: 1 on o, safe pawns...-veky |
Nov. 16, 2015, 5:27 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment Hayertjez: 1 on veky: What exactly? Lambda? Does [this comment](http://www.checkio.org/mission/secret-message/publications... |
Nov. 16, 2015, 4:58 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution StefanBN: 1 on Indexcept-veky |
Nov. 16, 2015, 1:15 p.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution flytaly: 4 on Stack-veky |
Nov. 16, 2015, 10:02 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution nikage: 1 on filter-veky |
Nov. 15, 2015, 5:19 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution redvan: 1 on filter-veky |
Nov. 15, 2015, 5:04 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution nikage: 1 on Indexcept-veky |
Nov. 15, 2015, 4:25 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution notsinglephoton: 2 on dimpleqonx-veky |
Nov. 15, 2015, 4:17 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment notsinglephoton: 1 on veky: Yes, you're right about the first part. That way, I map the operations to indices in the [truth-valu... |
Nov. 15, 2015, 2:04 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment Sim0000: 1 on veky: Well, what does the Python say? ok, let's try to see how we can solve this problem. Start IDLE. Ente... |
Nov. 15, 2015, 2:04 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment Sim0000: 1 on veky: Well, what does the Python say? ok, let's try to see how we can solve this problem. Start IDLE. Ente... |
Nov. 15, 2015, 12:29 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution keypython: 1 on for else-veky |
Nov. 15, 2015, 11:16 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution keypython: 1 on Indexcept-veky |
Nov. 15, 2015, 10:46 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution plane: 2 on Ordered-veky |
Nov. 15, 2015, 9:30 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution ifant: 2 on Symmetry-veky |
Nov. 15, 2015, 8:59 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Snillsparv: 1 on real base-veky |
Nov. 15, 2015, 8:21 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment SergeyEremeykin: 1 on veky: For me, recursion is not really obvious. You're always adding something to the result, and "calling ... |
Nov. 15, 2015, 7:38 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution unfalse: 1 on for else-veky |
Nov. 15, 2015, 6:08 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution muscn31: 2 on for else-veky |
Nov. 14, 2015, 11:10 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution SergeyEremeykin: 1 on Radical-veky |
Nov. 14, 2015, 11:07 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution SergeyEremeykin: 2 on First-veky |
Nov. 14, 2015, 9:58 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment k4ju: 1 on veky: Yes, and it's incredibly archaic. Please don't use it in new code. Use `in`, or in this case `not in... |
Nov. 14, 2015, 6:10 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution notsinglephoton: 2 on Indexcept-veky |
Nov. 14, 2015, 3:56 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution gakkouid: 1 on for else-veky |
Nov. 14, 2015, 12:27 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution ducthinhdt: 2 on for else-veky |
Nov. 14, 2015, 11:24 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution Hayertjez: 2 on for else-veky |
Nov. 14, 2015, 11:09 a.m. | -2 | Experience for voted solution Hayertjez: -2 on filter-veky |
Nov. 14, 2015, 5:07 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution mr.syas93: 2 on Single ended-veky |
Nov. 13, 2015, 11:44 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution johncorso: 1 on ~Shortest-veky |
Nov. 13, 2015, 8:38 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment tarjeii: 1 on veky: Imagine you have a list x of million items. What does x.pop(0) do? * it returns x[0] * it sets x[0] ... |
Nov. 13, 2015, 7:07 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution tarjeii: 2 on Stack-veky |
Nov. 13, 2015, 5:34 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution ARN: 1 on Single ended-veky |
Nov. 13, 2015, 4:08 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution jakobskadkaer: 1 on for else-veky |
Nov. 13, 2015, 3:10 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution OndrejJanas: 1 on Indexcept-veky |
Nov. 13, 2015, 2:20 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution nanpa: 1 on Optimal-veky |
Nov. 13, 2015, 1:51 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution syshenco: 1 on Indexcept-veky |
Nov. 13, 2015, 11:20 a.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution serg5978: 3 on Stack-veky |
Nov. 13, 2015, 8:55 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution sajkatav: 1 on Hinted-veky |
Nov. 12, 2015, 10:33 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Evgeny_Kuizhev: 1 on for else-veky |
Nov. 12, 2015, 10:19 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution majkelskofild2: 1 on for else-veky |
Nov. 12, 2015, 10:15 p.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution Kapucino: 4 on complex is better than complicated-veky |
Nov. 12, 2015, 6:04 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution ger_dur: 1 on Indexcept-veky |
Nov. 12, 2015, 7:56 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: You did not use it wrong. I just thought you didn't _have_ to use it. But in fact I was wrong. Here ... |
Nov. 12, 2015, 7:56 a.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: You did not use it wrong. I just thought you didn't _have_ to use it. But in fact I was wrong. Here ... |
Nov. 12, 2015, 7:42 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: Thank you. :-) I code for almost 30 years now - tried many languages, was good in many of them, but ... |
Nov. 12, 2015, 3:21 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: Ok, there are two things to consider. # Capturing natural levels of abstraction First, look at this:... |
Nov. 12, 2015, 3:15 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: Why not? It's an expression. lambda is the most natural way of writing expressions with arguments. I... |
Nov. 12, 2015, 3:15 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: Nothing special, just a local song. But you can play "Take my breath away" instead if you want. :-) |
Nov. 12, 2015, 3:13 a.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution xiaozhan: 3 on First we take Manhattan...-veky |
Nov. 12, 2015, 2:27 a.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: It seems you're trying to golf. In that case, `>9and` is three characters shorter than `>=10 and`. ;... |
Nov. 12, 2015, 2:27 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: It seems you're trying to golf. In that case, `>9and` is three characters shorter than `>=10 and`. ;... |
Nov. 11, 2015, 11:27 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution NicoF: 2 on complex>complicated-veky |
Nov. 11, 2015, 9:08 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: Slicing is better than indexing by range. And you don't need those mins then. |
Nov. 11, 2015, 7:19 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: Not magic, just illusionism, as I like to say. :-) Write code, see what's repeated, factor it out; w... |
Nov. 11, 2015, 7:06 a.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution xiaozhan: 3 on CNF-veky |
Nov. 11, 2015, 4:59 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: First, I don't think you really do (need to google that). From the title and the context, I assume y... |
Nov. 11, 2015, 4:44 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution xiaozhan: 2 on Both sides-veky |
Nov. 11, 2015, 2:45 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: Thanks. Though... It always puzzles me when people obviously like my solution, but don't give it thu... |
Nov. 11, 2015, 2:38 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment xiaozhan: 1 on veky: For me, it's other way around: "why use def when you can use lambda?". :-]] Namely, you can use def ... |
Nov. 11, 2015, 2:35 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution xiaozhan: 2 on ~Shortest-veky |
Nov. 10, 2015, 2:15 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution SneakyMind: 2 on Hinted-veky |
Nov. 9, 2015, 8:55 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Hifax: 1 on for else-veky |
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191