April 9, 2024, 10:45 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: Sure, but wouldn't it be _much_ easier just to have numbers 1~8 (with an explanation of what each nu...
|
Oct. 20, 2023, 10:03 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
jullios1104: Difficult to read, but interesting how lambda, reduce, map functions are used in one expression
|
Jan. 14, 2023, 12:47 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
dan_rue: Yeah, thats the good stuff! I would give you points for it, but sadly that doesn't work in 'random s...
|
May 28, 2022, 9:23 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
vvm70: maybe it would be simpler if you use a dict: **{'(': ')', ...}** or **str.replace()**
|
March 13, 2022, 1:11 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
kudinov.feodor: I do not really like while True, since you need to look for break condition inside loop You could us...
|
Jan. 6, 2022, 8:15 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Oleg_Levonjuk: Great!
|
Nov. 18, 2021, 8:39 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Hunteena: Nice code! You could use filter(None, items) instead of [item for item in items if item != 0]
|
Oct. 26, 2021, 5:52 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Oleg_Levonjuk: Yes, sympy is cool thing. 8-) +5
|
Oct. 4, 2021, 2:10 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
byrus: Since how_deep is just a wrapper for recursive_deep, you can use default arguments instead ``` def h...
|
Sept. 12, 2021, 9:34 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
_Chico__5d82cee4f5234e78a5c65e: Yeah, thanks!
|
Sept. 9, 2021, 11 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
oduvan: should be fixed
|
Aug. 29, 2021, 9:07 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
rougesteady: Nice work with the Binomial coefficient.
|
Aug. 23, 2021, 2:45 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
jsg-inet: Very interesting "for" loop! It avoid a special treatment for the first pair gdc calculation! (like ...
|
Aug. 17, 2021, 8:11 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
szlosek.michal: Nice and clean.
|
Aug. 16, 2021, 5:26 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
_Chico__5d82cee4f5234e78a5c65e: Next time if the test(asserts) a very long... please delete them :D Otherwise: Good solution!
|
Aug. 10, 2021, 11:54 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
sanjieyu: I missed 'One more argument is added – start_watching , and if it’s not passed, we count as in the p...
|
Aug. 9, 2021, 2:32 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
papier_mache: Note that passing `*a` as a function argument passes the entries of `a` as multiple arguments. That ...
|
Aug. 5, 2021, 5:13 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Phil15: That problem is quite rare, I'm not sure it really needs a new "rule". But if you do, don't take aut...
|
Aug. 5, 2021, 5:13 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
oduvan: @Phil15 now I think maybe not to allow manually remove solution if you get a code-reivew on it.
|
Aug. 5, 2021, 10:33 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
ogoro: Thank you!
|
July 30, 2021, 5:48 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
mnbvc123: Thanks :)
|
July 30, 2021, 10:33 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
mangeurdecowan: Thank you!!
|
July 29, 2021, 5:23 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
JasonVoorhees666: Thank you
|
July 29, 2021, 8:42 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
s.keigo.11235813: Thanks for your comment! Your advice will help me write better code.(๑╹ω╹๑ )
|
July 29, 2021, 8:41 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
s.keigo.11235813: Thank you! I am glad to hear you say so.( ´∀`)
|
July 26, 2021, 11:25 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Phil15: I like the ast module, but not much missions with [it](https://py.checkio.org/mission/count-comprehe...
|
July 23, 2021, 9:26 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Phil15: The author of the mission (here oduvan) have some access to it, plus he is admin so he probably has ...
|
July 22, 2021, 1:13 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
dsaz: great minds think alike
|
July 21, 2021, 7:55 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
oduvan: Yes. But they feel themselves a bit safer when they covered :)
|
July 20, 2021, 1:24 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
faren.fan: ah! thanks
|
July 20, 2021, 1:24 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
dangyi1115: I see. Thanks a lot
|
July 20, 2021, 1:23 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Splitter: Thank you very much)
|
July 19, 2021, 8:28 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
ibonyun: Thanks. I thought so too.
|
July 19, 2021, 7:25 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
sawako.oono: Happy for your comment :-)
|
July 15, 2021, 9:28 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Somebody12345678910_f2b343e5cf: @oduvan ?:o
|
July 7, 2021, 6:48 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
alterGNU: Simple ^^ well done!
|
June 30, 2021, 7:26 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
patrickdalroy: Thank you
|
June 26, 2021, 4:54 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
helebed: good
|
June 22, 2021, 9:59 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
_Chico__5d82cee4f5234e78a5c65e: @oduvan?
|
June 21, 2021, 10:27 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
leggewie: Yes, this is kind of a classic; You test a bool, only to decide which bool to return.
|
June 8, 2021, 6:28 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
_Chico__5d82cee4f5234e78a5c65e: @oduvan some badges don't work(see above)
|
June 8, 2021, 10:57 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: Yes. You're just missing a bit of math, and a thorough knowledge of the standard library. :-)
|
June 6, 2021, 10:46 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
_Chico__5d82cee4f5234e78a5c65e: Great solution! Good job!
|
June 6, 2021, 10:39 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
_Chico__5d82cee4f5234e78a5c65e: Nice one!
|
June 6, 2021, 10:36 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
_Chico__5d82cee4f5234e78a5c65e: This one is quite clear
|
June 5, 2021, 4:04 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
prigodski: Nice and simple
|
June 4, 2021, 8:55 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
_Chico__5d82cee4f5234e78a5c65e: Yes ,that’s right:/ let’s report to oduvan
|
June 3, 2021, 8:20 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Somebody12345678910_f2b343e5cf: Also got this bug ;/
|
June 3, 2021, 8:20 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
AvaJing: Good python knowledge
|
May 31, 2021, 5:46 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Phil15: __________________________________________ | Hello, I'm a cow... What do want from me?! | ==========...
|
May 31, 2021, 9:55 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
_Chico__5d82cee4f5234e78a5c65e: Nice,
|
May 30, 2021, 1:22 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
danila.s_82f7885346184ca098f30: simple and clever algorithm
|
May 24, 2021, 7:43 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
_Chico__5d82cee4f5234e78a5c65e: I used while many times and also reduce...and that try badge is also not working...
|
May 22, 2021, 6:05 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
juestr: - The precondition for costs should be a *positive* int. - A sentinel value for no route should prob...
|
May 22, 2021, 3:59 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
leggewie: good job, nice work
|
May 3, 2021, 3:45 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Ortega1988: good
|
Feb. 18, 2019, 1:54 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
kurosawa4434: I agree that there are several missions don't show the appropriate difficulty level. The difficulty ...
|
Feb. 15, 2019, 12:10 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
DaveDiFranco: You should include queue.
|
Feb. 15, 2019, 10:46 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Sim0000: I add task.wild-dogs tag.
|
Jan. 8, 2017, 11:27 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
AlexGiesbrecht: nice use of recursion
|
Aug. 15, 2016, 8:16 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Blastus: Good job on finding out what the telephone charges were! Your code would be easier to understand if ...
|
Aug. 7, 2016, 9:26 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
han97: better use deque of collections module, cause its faster.
|
Aug. 24, 2014, 7:27 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
oduvan: Decreasing experience is not a game-way :)
|
Aug. 24, 2014, 7:26 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
hanpari: It is hard to publish something really new or original on checkio. If this would be condition I woul...
|
July 11, 2014, 9:30 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Amachua: A discussion about that subject had already been opened: * http://www.checkio.org/forum/post/2011/mo...
|