33
Kurush
● 11 ● 29 ● 56 Leader of the month
6445/ 6695
Kurush Kurushich
Last seen 1 day ago
Member for 11 years, 1 month, 27 days
Difficulty Normal
Best reviews / Newest reviews
max() .get-lucas.stonedrake 1 1
My solution is the same as yours. More
str, len-Sim0000 1
The best possible solution for this task. More
one line solution-Lucaum_CF 1
I would have deleted brackets. But it is a matter of taste. More
Simple and obvious-Splitter 1 1
The best possible solution for this task. More
1-liner not-Stensen 1
You have chosen the right creative category in comparison with classical clear solution "return num % 2 == 0". More
keiです、ども(｀・ω・´)-s.keigo.11235813 1 1
The best possible solution for this task. More
Is Even-vvm70 1
I have used "return num % 2 == 0". It is hard to say which one is better. More
First-mscislaw 1
The best possible solution for this task. More
don't reinvent the wheel-ibonyun 1 1
The best possible solution for this task. More
First-sawako.oono 1 1
The best possible solution for this task. More
First-mscislaw 1
The list can be omitted. Good work! More
First-wo.tomasz 1
Your solution can be transformed to a one-liner "return text.split()[0]". More
Functional (takewhile + reduce)-romeech 1
Your solution is a clear demonstration of “takewhile” usage. More
Set theory-spitfire_ch 1 1
Your solution can be slightly reduced to "return len(set(elements)) <= 1". More
First-Bibiche 1
Je ne voudrais pas utiliser " lines = g [:] " pour renommer. Mais la solution est bonne. More
Max Digit-vvm70 1
The best possible solution for this task. More
First (using str.find )-tigerhu3180 1
An interesting idea of using the "find" function for number generation. More
.get-kalauroma7997 1
My solution is almost the same. I used "return max(data, key = data.get)" inside function. More
alphabet shifted-veky 1
You have used the same idea as I did but implemented it better. Nice! More
First-mr_vads 1
The best possible solution for this task. More
1
2 3 4 5