15
MMMAAANNN
Last seen 6 years ago
Member for 9 years, 2 months, 3 days
Difficulty Normal
Oct. 25, 2016, 4:16 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment hothat: that's cool |
Oct. 15, 2016, 8:40 p.m. | + 4 | for Boo-Pouf |
Aug. 19, 2016, 9:36 a.m. | + 1 | for Comment juliusgrabow: at least some humor. |
July 12, 2016, 9:31 a.m. | + 1 | for Comment seanonmurphy: Nice simple solution. Note you can use some shorthand syntax for your counter: counter += 1 Is the s... |
Dec. 20, 2015, 7:26 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment Sayhar: This deserves to be the best solution. Creative AND clear! We have a winner. |
Dec. 20, 2015, 7:26 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment SergeyEremeykin: This is definetly the best solution! |
Nov. 11, 2015, 10:50 a.m. | + 1 | for Comment hrvoje: This is very, very cool :) |
Sept. 1, 2015, 8:33 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment dsethlewis: I looked at it again and it's even better than I realized. You're making binary choices at each step... |
Sept. 1, 2015, 8:33 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment dsethlewis: I tried to implement this, but I didn't know how to pull off your code in line 5. Creative! |
Sept. 1, 2015, 8:32 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment alex.branderhorst: Similar to my solution, but a lot more elegant! |
Aug. 13, 2015, 11:44 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment not_real: Improve it using collections.deque, then you could substitute pop(0) by popleft() pop(0) is [quadrat... |
Aug. 2, 2015, 11:25 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment siebenschlaefer: Since you filed this under "clear": Don't you think linke 5 would be clearer as ``return int(bitcom,... |
Aug. 2, 2015, 8:08 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment greenmikey: I am really enjoying " "*bool(hundreds) It made me think for a second! |
July 9, 2015, 11:19 a.m. | + 1 | for Comment StefanPochmann: Took me forever to find those index expressions. My progression was: checkio=lambda n:'Fizz Buzz'[(n... |
July 9, 2015, 11:18 a.m. | + 4 | for Shortest? 52 - Kill me now-StefanPochmann |
July 3, 2015, 7:44 a.m. | + 4 | for First-madmanbob |
June 6, 2015, 8:04 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment dirk86: You've convinced me, I should make more use of standard libraries. Thank you! |
June 6, 2015, 8:03 p.m. | + 4 | for reduce-Cjkjvfnby |
May 27, 2015, 2:49 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment pandayue: The code is not very clean and can be shorten using the pow build in function |
May 5, 2015, 9:26 p.m. | + 4 | for String arithmetic-nickie |
April 22, 2015, 12:28 p.m. | + 4 | for random ver2-yukirin |
April 14, 2015, 8:01 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment zamuka: ++ for count += x > y |
April 14, 2015, 8 p.m. | + 4 | for Simple-kryksyh |
April 14, 2015, 2:44 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment bukebuer: Although I haven't solve it yet, I have some suggestion on the points given for this task: After a f... |
April 14, 2015, 12:57 p.m. | + 4 | for No imports-kayge |
April 5, 2015, 6:40 p.m. | + 3 | for switch-veky |
April 4, 2015, 4:50 p.m. | + 4 | for Friends set-hanpari |
April 3, 2015, 11:43 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment Cjkjvfnby: You can use tuple of tuples instead dict **elements = ((1000 : 'M'), ...)** to avoid sort. |
April 3, 2015, 11:43 p.m. | + 1 | for First-JulianNicholls |
April 2, 2015, 5:29 p.m. | + 1 | for Post Mission Ideas |
April 1, 2015, 11:22 p.m. | + 2 | for digestive-veky |
April 1, 2015, 11:21 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment psycocoffey: hashlib.new accepts an algorithm name so you don't need to eval untrusted input |
April 1, 2015, 11:20 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment frichard44: have a look to the hashlib.new()! |
April 1, 2015, 11:19 p.m. | + 3 | for AngelRaposo-AngelRaposo |
April 1, 2015, 3:44 a.m. | + 2 | for 1 liner-LMAO |
March 31, 2015, 11:38 p.m. | + 4 | for First-Cjkjvfnby |
March 31, 2015, 11:36 p.m. | + 1 | for REAL fun (no +, no -, nonono)-coells |
March 31, 2015, 11:32 p.m. | + 1 | for Using +-veky |
March 31, 2015, 10:04 p.m. | + 4 | for say quickly-gyahun_dash |
March 31, 2015, 10:01 p.m. | + 1 | for Clearly-gyahun_dash |
March 31, 2015, 2:12 p.m. | + 4 | for iterative_while-ciel |
March 31, 2015, 12:20 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment suic: Hi, a tip: indent your comments. |
March 31, 2015, 12:19 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment suic: Hi, straightforward... hmmm... but not pythonic: Look at extended slices and _sum()_ built-in functi... |
March 31, 2015, 11:38 a.m. | + 4 | for strings!-datruth29 |
March 31, 2015, 11:25 a.m. | + 4 | for 59-Volatility |
March 31, 2015, 11:23 a.m. | + 4 | for re-Talim42 |
March 31, 2015, 11:02 a.m. | + 4 | for str_73-fantakeshi |
March 30, 2015, 7:22 p.m. | + 1 | for Task The Einstein Problem-Lite |
March 30, 2015, 4:34 p.m. | + 4 | for First-LMAO |
March 24, 2015, 9:59 p.m. | + 1 | for Factored-veky |
March 24, 2015, 9:58 p.m. | + 4 | for Second-gyahun_dash |
March 24, 2015, 9:53 p.m. | + 4 | for Minimal-BertrandBordage |
March 24, 2015, 3:50 p.m. | + 1 | for Simple math-nickie |
March 24, 2015, 10:04 a.m. | + 4 | for First-bukebuer |
March 24, 2015, 10:03 a.m. | + 1 | for First-xiongbiao |
March 24, 2015, 5:43 a.m. | + 2 | for Math-bryukh |
March 24, 2015, 4:56 a.m. | + 4 | for Adjustment-veky |
March 24, 2015, 3:48 a.m. | + 2 | for To_ordinal-pythonist |
March 24, 2015, 3:16 a.m. | + 1 | for First-markovic.vasilije |
March 24, 2015, 2:54 a.m. | + 1 | for Comment LLluma: zip(*matr) That is enough :D |
March 23, 2015, 8:54 p.m. | + 3 | for Stack-veky |
March 23, 2015, 8:20 p.m. | + 3 | for 4 ifs in a loop-odwl |
March 23, 2015, 8:17 p.m. | + 3 | for Stackless-blabaster |
March 23, 2015, 6:59 p.m. | + 2 | for Recursion-kendriu |
March 23, 2015, 6:31 p.m. | + 3 | for First-zero_loss |
March 23, 2015, 6:29 p.m. | + 1 | for First-JamesArruda |
March 23, 2015, 6:24 p.m. | + 3 | for DP-gyahun_dash |
March 23, 2015, 6:23 p.m. | + 1 | for First-Amachua |
March 23, 2015, 3:25 p.m. | + 3 | for chr/ord manipulation-IanSolWhite |
March 23, 2015, 3:16 p.m. | + 1 | for First-Pouf |
March 23, 2015, 3:12 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment Cjkjvfnby: It is simple and clear, but bad formated. Long string make it hard to read. |
March 23, 2015, 3:11 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment hanpari: But a little bit unreadable, don't you think? :) (At least for Clear category.) |
March 23, 2015, 3:07 p.m. | + 3 | for First-e.roboda |
March 23, 2015, 12:11 p.m. | + 2 | for First-IanSolWhite |
March 23, 2015, 12:09 p.m. | + 2 | for First-nesterione |
March 22, 2015, 9:58 p.m. | + 2 | for Second-RomanKorbutyak |
March 22, 2015, 9:38 p.m. | + 2 | for First-shisashi |
March 22, 2015, 9:35 p.m. | + 1 | for Comment bryukh: This is original and interesting solution, but is not "Clear" for newbies. I would give you thumbsUp... |
March 22, 2015, 9:05 p.m. | + 2 | for by frozenset-evoynov |
March 21, 2015, 11:39 p.m. | + 2 | for First-Gennady |
March 21, 2015, 11:20 p.m. | + 2 | for Set generation and length comparison-Rob019 |
March 21, 2015, 11:17 p.m. | + 2 | for First-dagger126 |
March 21, 2015, 2:50 p.m. | + 2 | for The End of Other-MadCow234 |
March 21, 2015, 1:26 p.m. | + 2 | for First-Reloader |
March 21, 2015, 1:11 p.m. | + 2 | for First-ChubinOleg |
March 21, 2015, 1:10 p.m. | + 2 | for First-nptwz |
March 21, 2015, 1:08 p.m. | + 2 | for First-JamesNippoc |
March 21, 2015, 11:58 a.m. | + 2 | for First-bukebuer |
March 21, 2015, 11:25 a.m. | + 2 | for Second-bishudas_171d8dd0c2f2470dbf5a0 |
March 21, 2015, 11:16 a.m. | + 2 | for First-Bellerafont |
March 21, 2015, 11:15 a.m. | + 2 | for First-prodigy_da |
March 21, 2015, 10:49 a.m. | + 2 | for First-gyahun_dash |
March 21, 2015, 10:48 a.m. | + 2 | for First-penguinland |
March 20, 2015, 11:47 a.m. | + 2 | for First-voroninman_c8846b1d0ba947a4823 |
March 20, 2015, 11:47 a.m. | + 2 | for Clear-timiway |
March 20, 2015, 11:43 a.m. | + 1 | for Comment dbezverkhiy: Your program is a little bit not obvious. When you check for equals 2 on line 6, but in task it was ... |
March 20, 2015, 11:14 a.m. | + 1 | for First-ignalion |
March 20, 2015, 8:35 a.m. | + 1 | for Indexcept-veky |
March 20, 2015, 8:35 a.m. | + 1 | for First-gyahun_dash |
March 20, 2015, 8:21 a.m. | + 1 | for First-RRRQ |