May 10, 2024, 12:24 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
zeixes: Sorry, man i was wrong in my comment, because i didn't test your soluthion properly.
|
May 8, 2024, noon |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: Those two pops are endearing! :)
|
April 25, 2024, 10:34 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
dan_rue: Very nice! Thanks for reminding me that map can take more than one iterable.
|
April 6, 2024, 9:24 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
amandel: Bad use of boolean. If **B** is a boolean expression, then **True if B else False** has the same val...
|
March 27, 2024, 2:48 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: Thanks @StefanPochmann (do you ever sleep)?
|
March 23, 2024, 8:35 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Kolia951: I'm sorry, is that a "Clear" solution? =) Looks like I need to read PEP-8 once again...
|
March 20, 2024, 9:19 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
juestr: Nice stack/slist. Any special reason you chose (tail, head) in the opposite order than customary?
|
Jan. 2, 2022, 8:54 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: The only funnier thing would be if this was published in the Speedy category. :-DD
|
Dec. 21, 2021, 9:59 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: It's fascinating that A changes type from first iteration into the following ones, and nobody bats a...
|
March 26, 2018, 6 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
suic: This is not speedy. It's actually O(n^2).
|
March 26, 2018, 1 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: `map(instructions.count, 'fblr')` would be even better. :-)
|
Nov. 23, 2017, 1:46 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Oddys: I wish I had more than 2 pluses to give!)
|
Sept. 18, 2017, 12:19 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
DahliaSR: @veky once argued with me, because I was mapping a lambda. He explained that this is a LISPsm!!! I d...
|
Aug. 1, 2017, 10:52 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: It's funny how your naming quickly deteriorated from most_wanted_letter_alpha # wow, I'm feeling so ...
|
July 29, 2017, 1:32 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: Nice and straightforward. bools can be used arithmetically in total += (p>e) - (p<e), this RHS being...
|
May 28, 2015, 2:07 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
nickie: We're dealing with deep philosophical questions here. Something that's not a number, is it a number?
|
May 6, 2015, 11:11 a.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: I put those chars @StefanPochmann generously provided me to good use - traded them for spaces at a f...
|
April 25, 2015, 10:52 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sn4BqpI1p6E :-D
|
April 25, 2015, 7:01 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
htamas: [Did you mean](http://tr.im/4tbdr): checkio = (lambda N, H, R=range, L=len: (lambda *_:0)(*map(*reve...
|
April 25, 2015, 4:17 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: You could have made even better: checkio = {'0'*6, '707409', '100478', ...}.__contains__ ;-)
|
April 23, 2015, 11:03 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
maurice.makaay: In this solution, I first compute the radius of the circle, based on the three provided points. Seco...
|
April 23, 2015, 7:50 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Cjkjvfnby: **{g(p//n+d*k,p%n+e*k)** I usualy produse such text by random typing instead of **lorem ipsum** :)
|
April 21, 2015, 8:35 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
cle99y: surprised nobody has voted this up as it is simpler in my eyes than the most votes solution :)
|
April 18, 2015, 2:24 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: This should be fast enough for you performance fetishists. :-P Explanation of a title, since I've se...
|
April 18, 2015, 2:20 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: Inspired by an (algorithmically beautiful, Pythonically ugly:) [RRRQ's solution](http://www.checkio....
|
April 17, 2015, 11:09 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: Since so many people here adore your solution, I won't spend too much words about how beautiful it i...
|
April 15, 2015, 10:55 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
Cjkjvfnby: I try to make this code more readable for me :). from itertools import zip_longest def checkio(text,...
|
April 13, 2015, 7:41 p.m. |
+ 1 |
for Comment
veky: LOL, this really wins an award for the most complicated solution of the task. Famous `if`/`pass`/`el...
|