29
Last seen 3 months ago
Member for 2 years, 3 months, 6 days
Difficulty Normal
Feb. 16, 2024, 9:20 p.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution dig: 3 on First-lxf42 |
Nov. 23, 2023, 3:39 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted comment gleb10101010101: 1 on lxf42: no need to call int, len returns an int |
Nov. 8, 2023, 2:11 p.m. | +10 | Experience for voted solution U.V: 1 on multiple re.subn-lxf42 |
July 29, 2023, 6:27 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted comment flowerinapot: 1 on lxf42: I don't like the use of global variables when the task it to implement a class |
July 29, 2023, 6:22 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment flowerinapot: 1 on lxf42: In my opinion this is not a correct solution to the problem as stated. It passes the tests, but it d... |
July 29, 2023, 5:51 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment flowerinapot: 1 on lxf42: Your code will only work for the first word if the text starts with a word. And like Simm0000 pointe... |
July 29, 2023, 5:49 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment flowerinapot: 1 on lxf42: The whole **should contain at least one digit, but it cannot consist of just digits.** is to be cons... |
July 26, 2023, 4:57 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted comment flowerinapot: 1 on lxf42: The Army class/its methods not being abstract means that an Army object can be created. The methods ... |
July 4, 2023, 2:56 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment flowerinapot: 1 on lxf42: You need to implement the is_alive as property not as method (function) of the class. This will when... |
July 4, 2023, 2:56 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment flowerinapot: 1 on lxf42: You need to implement the is_alive as property not as method (function) of the class. This will when... |
June 5, 2023, 4:51 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment mikaeldovbnia: 1 on lxf42: While this code works perfectly well, you should take care with adding a 2nd unneeded check (the sec... |
June 5, 2023, 4:51 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted comment mikaeldovbnia: 1 on lxf42: While this code works perfectly well, you should take care with adding a 2nd unneeded check (the sec... |
April 28, 2023, 7:12 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution Max0526: 1 on recursive one-liner-lxf42 |
April 27, 2023, 5:22 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution vladislav_gorbatenko: 2 on capitalize, upper, lower-lxf42 |
April 24, 2023, 12:50 p.m. | +21 | Experience for voted solution dig: 4 on First-lxf42 |
April 19, 2023, 6:43 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution cosmos.: 1 on 32 chars-lxf42 |
March 10, 2023, 6:40 p.m. | +24 | Experience for voted solution hkgok1: 5 on date and timedelta-lxf42 |
Feb. 24, 2023, 10:24 p.m. | +5 | Experience for voted solution ozg: 4 on 1, 2 or 3-lxf42 |
Feb. 18, 2023, 9:31 p.m. | +9 | Experience for voted solution undarkside: 2 on yields-lxf42 |
Feb. 5, 2023, 4:47 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution jensenandrew7: 1 on Second - 1 liner with 2 lists-lxf42 |
Feb. 4, 2023, 1:17 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution vladosich1992: 1 on summing bools-lxf42 |
Jan. 29, 2023, 8:15 a.m. | +6 | Experience for voted solution Evgeny_Andronov: 5 on easy with numpy-lxf42 |
Jan. 16, 2023, 12:57 p.m. | +9 | Experience for solved mission Latest ISO datetime |
Jan. 14, 2023, 5:02 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment kdim: 1 on lxf42: Well, hardly magic, just think what happens inside the max function: for each `item` in `winners`, t... |
Jan. 4, 2023, 11:10 p.m. | +18 | Experience for voted solution dig: 2 on defaultdict-lxf42 |
Dec. 23, 2022, 2:22 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted comment Red_Ale: 1 on lxf42: I was surprised to see the 3 Factory classes (the naming is a little weird imho, the Army class name... |
Dec. 23, 2022, 2:22 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment Red_Ale: 1 on lxf42: I was surprised to see the 3 Factory classes (the naming is a little weird imho, the Army class name... |
Dec. 23, 2022, 1:24 p.m. | +6 | Experience for solved mission Goes Right After (simplified) |
Dec. 20, 2022, 11:21 p.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution dan_rue: 2 on any endswith-lxf42 |
Dec. 14, 2022, 9:01 p.m. | +5 | Experience for voted solution Kolia951: 1 on Just iterating over the list-lxf42 |
Dec. 14, 2022, 12:53 p.m. | +15 | Experience for solved mission The Stones |
Dec. 13, 2022, 10:10 a.m. | +8 | Experience for solved mission Treasures |
Dec. 12, 2022, 6 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment jusha: 1 on lxf42: Does not cover the case of '-.' and '+.', you would need to add it to the exclusion list. |
Dec. 12, 2022, 6 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment jusha: 1 on lxf42: Does not cover the case of '-.' and '+.', you would need to add it to the exclusion list. |
Dec. 12, 2022, 2:21 p.m. | +15 | Experience for solved mission Changing direction |
Dec. 12, 2022, 2:14 p.m. | +8 | Experience for solved mission Duplicate Zeros |
Dec. 12, 2022, 12:55 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment dx2-66: 1 on lxf42: I think it's easier to compare directly instead of subtraction followed by conversion to bool. I eve... |
Dec. 12, 2022, 12:55 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment dx2-66: 1 on lxf42: I think it's easier to compare directly instead of subtraction followed by conversion to bool. I eve... |
Dec. 12, 2022, 12:33 p.m. | +9 | Experience for solved mission Not in Order |
Dec. 7, 2022, 1:03 p.m. | +9 | Experience for solved mission Common Tail |
Dec. 7, 2022, 10:16 a.m. | +15 | Experience for solved mission Is String a Number? (Part II) |
Dec. 7, 2022, 10:04 a.m. | +15 | Experience for solved mission Is String a Number? |
Dec. 5, 2022, 9:28 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment mu_py: 1 on lxf42: That is soo lame ... |
Dec. 5, 2022, 8:51 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment mu_py: 1 on lxf42: Nice to see `with` used here on checkio not to to suppress exceptions |
Dec. 5, 2022, 8:51 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment mu_py: 1 on lxf42: Nice to see `with` used here on checkio not to to suppress exceptions |
Nov. 29, 2022, 1:47 a.m. | +7 | Experience for voted solution hbczmxy: 5 on count with loop-lxf42 |
Nov. 21, 2022, 2:18 p.m. | +12 | Experience for solved mission Interesting, intersecting |
Nov. 10, 2022, 6:34 a.m. | +15 | Experience for solved mission When "k" is Enough! |
Nov. 6, 2022, 9:50 a.m. | +7 | Experience for voted solution zongareight: 2 on First-lxf42 |
Nov. 4, 2022, 11:09 a.m. | +15 | Experience for solved mission Adjacent Letters |
Nov. 4, 2022, 8:45 a.m. | +15 | Experience for solved mission Sort Sorted Groups |
Nov. 2, 2022, 9:57 a.m. | +9 | Experience for solved mission One Switch Strings |
Oct. 25, 2022, 1:01 a.m. | +7 | Experience for voted solution hbczmxy: 5 on re-lxf42 |
Oct. 24, 2022, 11:03 p.m. | +8 | Experience for voted solution viktor.chyrkin: 5 on capitalize, upper, lower-lxf42 |
Oct. 21, 2022, 8:30 p.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution nom222: 1 on capitalize, upper, lower-lxf42 |
Oct. 20, 2022, 2:29 p.m. | +7 | Experience for voted solution Karsten.g: 5 on max, lambda and sum-lxf42 |
Oct. 14, 2022, 8:17 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment mu_py: 1 on lxf42: indeed, I thought that after changing, solutions would get rechecked and newly invalid ones removed |
Oct. 12, 2022, 8:02 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution mu_py: 1 on int str-lxf42 |
Oct. 11, 2022, 7:41 a.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution burgerlolo314: 4 on with a dict-lxf42 |
Oct. 6, 2022, 7:54 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution JohnDoe1891: 1 on First-lxf42 |
Oct. 3, 2022, 9:49 p.m. | +7 | Experience for voted solution vvm70: 5 on re-lxf42 |
Oct. 2, 2022, 6:24 a.m. | +6 | Experience for voted solution mithilkotak: 4 on maxed comprehensions-lxf42 |
Oct. 1, 2022, 10:05 p.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution lisovsky: 4 on using f-string-lxf42 |
Sept. 29, 2022, 6:04 p.m. | +6 | Experience for voted solution Red_Ale: 4 on First-lxf42 |
Sept. 29, 2022, 11:27 a.m. | +9 | Experience for solved mission Move Zeros |
Sept. 23, 2022, 12:12 p.m. | +15 | Experience for solved mission Missing Number |
Sept. 22, 2022, 9:18 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution JohnDoe1891: 1 on sum & isdigit-lxf42 |
Sept. 21, 2022, 1:42 p.m. | +24 | Experience for voted solution Wartem: 3 on good task for re-lxf42 |
Sept. 21, 2022, 12:48 p.m. | +6 | Experience for voted solution Selindian: 5 on with exception handling-lxf42 |
Sept. 21, 2022, 6:54 a.m. | +12 | Experience for voted solution mithilkotak: 4 on let's evaluate some string-lxf42 |
Sept. 21, 2022, 1:41 a.m. | +10 | Experience for voted solution viktor.chyrkin: 5 on int str-lxf42 |
Sept. 19, 2022, 10:54 a.m. | +9 | Experience for solved mission Switch Keys to Values |
Sept. 17, 2022, 2:13 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution Viach2: 1 on 1, 2 or 3-lxf42 |
Sept. 15, 2022, 7:47 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment Phil15: 1 on lxf42: no worries, I perfectly understand. That was just a comment and not a critique or complaint ;) |
Sept. 14, 2022, 5:29 p.m. | +7 | Experience for voted solution Wartem: 5 on short-lxf42 |
Sept. 14, 2022, 1:37 p.m. | +12 | Experience for solved mission Long Pressed |
Sept. 14, 2022, 11:21 a.m. | +12 | Experience for solved mission Aggregate by Operation |
Sept. 14, 2022, 10:44 a.m. | +15 | Experience for solved mission Convert and Aggregate |
Sept. 14, 2022, 8:42 a.m. | +12 | Experience for solved mission The Final Stone |
Sept. 13, 2022, 1:04 p.m. | +9 | Experience for solved mission Correct Capital |
Sept. 12, 2022, 10:50 a.m. | +9 | Experience for solved mission Sum of Digits |
Sept. 7, 2022, 11:13 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution U.V: 2 on strings and chain-lxf42 |
Sept. 6, 2022, 4:02 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment kdim: 1 on lxf42: The conversion to numpy array is not needed, you may pass data directly to the det function. |
Sept. 6, 2022, 4:02 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment kdim: 1 on lxf42: The conversion to numpy array is not needed, you may pass data directly to the det function. |
Sept. 5, 2022, 2:40 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution koborC: 1 on First-lxf42 |
Aug. 29, 2022, 6:12 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment Stensen: 1 on lxf42: Nice to see `with` used here on checkio not to to suppress exceptions |
Aug. 29, 2022, 6:12 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment Stensen: 1 on lxf42: Nice to see `with` used here on checkio not to to suppress exceptions |
Aug. 28, 2022, 1:22 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution ozg: 1 on set and sorted-lxf42 |
Aug. 27, 2022, 7 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution nax.tacxit: 1 on TRYing-lxf42 |
Aug. 24, 2022, 11:57 a.m. | +9 | Experience for solved mission Integer Palindrome |
Aug. 20, 2022, 9:54 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution ozg: 1 on format with datetime-lxf42 |
Aug. 16, 2022, 8:26 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment Phil15: 1 on lxf42: Nice clear solution, easy to read code. |
Aug. 16, 2022, 8:26 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted comment Phil15: 1 on lxf42: Nice clear solution, easy to read code. |
Aug. 5, 2022, 12:30 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment Phil15: 1 on lxf42: That is soo lame ... |
Aug. 5, 2022, 12:20 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment Phil15: 1 on lxf42: quite lame way to get badges |
Aug. 3, 2022, 9:03 p.m. | +7 | Experience for voted solution pawel80121: 1 on First-lxf42 |
Aug. 2, 2022, 7:24 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution pawel80121: 1 on check alphabet chars with set-lxf42 |
Aug. 1, 2022, 3:16 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment viktor.chyrkin: 1 on lxf42: There is however a small issue, python passes lists a reference to the original list. This means cha... |
July 29, 2022, 11:57 a.m. | +15 | Experience for solved mission New Cities |
July 26, 2022, 3:10 p.m. | +5 | Experience for voted solution mikaeldovbnia: 5 on format with datetime-lxf42 |