11
p4r4d0x42
● 1 ● 9 ● 22
576/ 645
Last seen 1 year ago
Member for 11 years, 6 months, 28 days
Difficulty Normal
Best reviews / Newest reviews
First-sguberman
Nice commenting and clean presentation. :) More
Second - A bit scarier than the first one.-p4r4d0x42
This demonic solution is causing me a frighten!! Borf is also called on line 7 up to 4999 possible times. Borf is recursive and will generating Fibonacci sequences until it's t / 45 * 3 in size. Every recursive call to borf causes a new list to be created and stays in memory. Borf has the potent More
First-panaro32
This is casing me a spook! [borf](http://imgur.com/gallery/GrwFL) More
First-AlbertTovmasyan
That's a pretty neat way to handle that. Didn't think about slicing. I'll have to keep that in mind. More
First-Margaruga
Recursion.... Nice way to handle this. More
First-Legion_Pleingaz
Nicely done. Looks like i did it the hard way.... More
First-Legion_Pleingaz
Nice. wasn't sure if ** would do the trick. Ended up using the math module. More
Simple-u8m_
That's pretty slick. Was looking for the lambda way to do this. More
Basic-p4r4d0x42
I know there is a better way to do this. It's quit'n time so this will have to do. :P More
Very Creative - dictionary with alphabet-simonemille7
Going out on a limb here... Did you come from a c background? Nice solution and aptly categorized. More
set-gyahun_dash
Wow, that's quite a bit shorter than mine. Nice work. I'll have to look into that frozen set a bit more. More
First-bukebuer
Nice, pretty much what I did. I ended up using from datetime import date and then abs((date(*date1) - date(*date2)).days) Just a smidgen shorter but doesn't really seem to make a difference. More
timedelta-veky 1
Nice example use of lamda. Clean and easy to read. More
First-AnupamSharma
Not a bad way to do that. Nice. :) More
First-marcin85
It gets the job done. Could have moved the cons==3 check under the word.isalpha check that way it would have only run under the condition that it could actually be true. Here it runs even if cons==0. It's really a minor tweak but could help if you're running a really large strings through. Nice wo More
First-nojima
That, is an interesting way to do this. I was trying to figure out a way to pair my solution down a bit. Nice work. More
Shouldn't this be named pushpop?-p4r4d0x42
pop() wasn't really cutting it. It's default behavior is to remove the top item. You can tell it what one you want it to pop by providing it an int but couldn't get it working correctly. Seemed to much fuss to re-porpoise that rather than just use .remove. ;) More
First -p4r4d0x42
I have been trying to get this paired down a bit but haven't had much luck. Taking a break and will look at it more later. More
First-g.rodgeers
Interesting way to do this. Seems like there there is always another way to do stuff in python. :) More
First-ceu9jo
I wasn't sure what to do with the Font so removed it. Nice work. More
1
2 3