13
vananabu
● 2 ● 12 ● 26
800/ 845
Last seen 1 year ago
Member for 8 years, 9 months, 24 days
Difficulty Normal
Best reviews / Newest reviews
short and clear-StefanPochmann 4
There is one question after your solutions: 'why did not I think of that?' it's so simple :) bravo! More
First-Sim0000 1
cool format output - in one loop) More
First-Daniel_Pereira 1
awesome w in text.lower() More
Single ended-veky 1 1
I like how you mix peek and pop in one condition! More
Deceptive-veky 1 1
Very clever m + max(m - 100, 0) More
Feed Pigeons-CounterSparta
"fed" with your "while" is very clever! so simple and so powerful) More
Keep it simple-StefanPochmann
it is so simple, even for me :) More
First-panaro32
Your solutions is the best. good idea sum(l[-1:]) and you don’t need to check the tuple)) cool :) and with slice instead generator would be awesome! More
No len()-LewisFogden
Excellent! Non-standard solution. More
accumulate-veky 1
take likes. i'll puzzle out into your solution later:) More
First-aminami1127 1
min(text.lower().count(x), 1) clever:) More
First-apotokin
good idea with Cramer's method More
Both-veky 1
range(2) as True and False! subtly as always) More
First-Cjkjvfnby
excellent idea to compare the numbers! More
First-vananabu
I need some time to convert my knowledge and experience on Python's way:-) More
First-vananabu
Thank you, maybe with generator would be better?:) like: return [item for item in data if data.count(item) != 1] More
First-vananabu
First of all, sorry for my English:) my knowledge in English like a knowledge in Python.:-) Your comments give me the food for thought. Last week I spent with Mark Lutz:) I will refactor. More