40
Last seen 4 days ago
Member for 9 years, 10 months, 19 days
Difficulty Advanced
| Dec. 18, 2017, 12:19 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Nikusha: 1 on One-liner variation-suic |
| Dec. 11, 2017, 4:09 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution przemyslaw.daniel: 1 on Using str.format-suic |
| Dec. 10, 2017, 3:01 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Kunkgg: 1 on Ceph's Refactored-suic |
| Dec. 8, 2017, 12:29 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment SockTaters: 1 on suic: Hi, to choose one option is quite limiting, it would be better vote for multiple options. I would li... |
| Dec. 7, 2017, 10:36 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Noah1786: 1 on Recursive one-liner-suic |
| Dec. 7, 2017, 7:01 a.m. | +5 | Experience for voted solution JackyCore: 3 on JaredGillespie's compressed-suic |
| Dec. 4, 2017, 11:08 p.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution weizhe1983: 2 on Simple-suic |
| Nov. 25, 2017, 1:12 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment ira: 1 on suic: Hi, if *correct* means that it passes all the tests then it's correct. The reason I find my solution... |
| Nov. 25, 2017, 1:17 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution SockTaters: 1 on Repetitio est mater studiorum :D-suic |
| Nov. 21, 2017, 8:57 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment flpo: 1 on suic: Hi, this is nice and correct :) P.S.: A more codegolfish version of `append_dot`: `lambda s: s+"."*(... |
| Nov. 21, 2017, 8:57 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment flpo: 1 on suic: Hi, this is nice and correct :) P.S.: A more codegolfish version of `append_dot`: `lambda s: s+"."*(... |
| Nov. 21, 2017, 5:19 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment Tinus_Trotyl: 1 on suic: Hi, if *correct* means that it passes all the tests then it's correct. The reason I find my solution... |
| Nov. 19, 2017, 5:21 a.m. | -1 | Experience for voted solution whitycatty: -1 on One-liner variation-suic |
| Nov. 18, 2017, 6:56 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment StefanPochmann: 1 on suic: Hi, if *correct* means that it passes all the tests then it's correct. The reason I find my solution... |
| Nov. 18, 2017, 2:53 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment flpo: 1 on suic: Thanks, you're right :) |
| Nov. 18, 2017, 1:31 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment flpo: 1 on suic: Hi, I know that this is a creative solution but `methodcaller` is simply redundant here: ```python c... |
| Nov. 18, 2017, 1:31 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment flpo: 1 on suic: Hi, I know that this is a creative solution but `methodcaller` is simply redundant here: ```python c... |
| Nov. 18, 2017, 5:25 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment veky: 1 on suic: Hi, if *correct* means that it passes all the tests then it's correct. The reason I find my solution... |
| Nov. 15, 2017, 7:58 a.m. | +8 | Experience for solved mission Between Markers |
| Nov. 14, 2017, 4:16 p.m. | +5 | Experience for solved mission Correct Sentence |
| Nov. 14, 2017, 4:07 p.m. | +8 | Experience for solved mission Second Index |
| Nov. 14, 2017, 3:57 p.m. | +8 | Experience for solved mission First Word |
| Nov. 14, 2017, 3:53 p.m. | +5 | Experience for solved mission Say Hi |
| Nov. 8, 2017, 9:26 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment R2R: 1 on suic: Hi, I like this. Can you do it without `...if...else...`? Regards, suic |
| Nov. 8, 2017, 9:26 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment R2R: 1 on suic: Hi, I like this. Can you do it without `...if...else...`? Regards, suic |
| Nov. 8, 2017, 9:24 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment R2R: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. Here you don't need to import `operator`: `bin(m.__xor__(n)).count('1')` 2. and of course you... |
| Nov. 8, 2017, 9:24 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment R2R: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. Here you don't need to import `operator`: `bin(m.__xor__(n)).count('1')` 2. and of course you... |
| Nov. 8, 2017, 8:33 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment R2R: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. `[::2]` is enough. 2. `if Z else` is even more pythonic. 3. The next step: Get rid off `...if... |
| Nov. 8, 2017, 8:33 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment R2R: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. `[::2]` is enough. 2. `if Z else` is even more pythonic. 3. The next step: Get rid off `...if... |
| Nov. 7, 2017, 7:44 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution R2R: 1 on Using magic method-suic |
| Nov. 7, 2017, 7:22 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution calarkin27: 1 on Simple-suic |
| Oct. 31, 2017, 5:09 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Andrey__Novikov: 1 on One-liner variation-suic |
| Oct. 27, 2017, 4:12 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution amanohikari: 1 on One-liner-suic |
| Oct. 26, 2017, 12:13 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution reutt: 1 on Ceph's Refactored-suic |
| Oct. 24, 2017, 7:02 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution homerrowsky: 1 on Recursive one-liner-suic |
| Oct. 24, 2017, 6:37 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution Bronepoezd: 1 on One-liner-suic |
| Oct. 19, 2017, 4:35 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution peterdblrgt3: 1 on XOR-suic |
| Oct. 15, 2017, 10:06 p.m. | +8 | Experience for solved mission Bigger Price |
| Oct. 15, 2017, 10:03 p.m. | +5 | Experience for solved mission Easy Unpack |
| Oct. 15, 2017, 9:55 p.m. | +5 | Experience for solved mission The Most Frequent |
| Oct. 14, 2017, 9:51 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment BoriszBlade: 1 on suic: You don't need the if ... else at all: def checkio(array): return len(array) and sum(array[::2]) * a... |
| Oct. 14, 2017, 4:29 p.m. | -2 | Experience for voted solution lucas.Pickl: -2 on Variation on paolo.brasolin's theme :)-suic |
| Oct. 10, 2017, 9:07 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution cjaz: 1 on Recursive one-liner-suic |
| Sept. 30, 2017, 3:51 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment veky: 1 on suic: I guess, the _reason_ behind this is: `C-style code => C like speed` :D |
| Sept. 30, 2017, 3:51 a.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment veky: 1 on suic: I guess, the _reason_ behind this is: `C-style code => C like speed` :D |
| Sept. 28, 2017, 3:53 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Satoshi_Bando: 1 on One-liner variation-suic |
| Sept. 25, 2017, 3:17 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution Kertalo: 2 on Revisited KvaNTy's Straight and primitive-suic |
| Sept. 25, 2017, 2:44 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution kgudals: 1 on One-liner variation-suic |
| Sept. 23, 2017, 6:23 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment oduvan: 1 on suic: Hi, one of the most important and powerful feature of Python is `in`: for word in words: now = 0; wo... |
| Sept. 23, 2017, 6:23 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment oduvan: 1 on suic: Hi, one of the most important and powerful feature of Python is `in`: for word in words: now = 0; wo... |
| Sept. 21, 2017, 7:53 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution Norritsin: 2 on Minimalist-suic |
| Sept. 21, 2017, 7:53 a.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution Norritsin: 2 on Using magic method-suic |
| Sept. 20, 2017, 7:27 p.m. | +10 | Experience for voted solution Norritsin: 2 on One-liner-suic |
| Sept. 20, 2017, 2:30 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution shrewdmechanic: 1 on One-liner-suic |
| Sept. 16, 2017, 7:31 a.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution ylrih: 2 on Wikipedia: Levenshtein distance-suic |
| Sept. 15, 2017, 3:03 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution brunonar: 1 on One-liner variation-suic |
| Sept. 6, 2017, 11:37 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution Ballistik: 2 on One-liner with groupby-suic |
| Sept. 6, 2017, 3:04 p.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution Ark_Shi: 1 on jtrip's on one line-suic |
| Sept. 5, 2017, 6:57 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Norritsin: 1 on Another one-liner-suic |
| Aug. 29, 2017, 6:49 p.m. | +8 | Experience for solved mission Bigger Together |
| Aug. 27, 2017, 12:57 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution StoneMr: 1 on Shortened-suic |
| Aug. 25, 2017, 11:16 a.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution satoshi1117: 1 on Wikipedia: Levenshtein distance-suic |
| Aug. 22, 2017, 1:34 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Meganevra: 1 on One-liner-suic |
| Aug. 17, 2017, 4:44 a.m. | -2 | Experience for voted solution mnblonsky: -1 on One-liner with groupby-suic |
| Aug. 16, 2017, 2:01 p.m. | +6 | Experience for voted solution tipstar: 1 on Sim0000's one-liner without if :)-suic |
| Aug. 13, 2017, 7:28 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution senbo: 1 on Ceph's Refactored-suic |
| Aug. 12, 2017, 7:37 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution chris995: 1 on One-liner with groupby-suic |
| Aug. 11, 2017, 7:50 p.m. | +8 | Experience for solved mission Long Repeat |
| Aug. 5, 2017, 1:07 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment alf605: 1 on suic: Minimalist (thumbsup) |
| Aug. 4, 2017, 4:08 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution alf605: 1 on Another one-liner-suic |
| Aug. 4, 2017, 2:52 p.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution mattheword1: 2 on Minimalist-suic |
| Aug. 2, 2017, 8:04 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution Meng_Hong: 2 on Less duplication-suic |
| July 26, 2017, 4:35 p.m. | -3 | Experience for voted solution Lemmi: -3 on Less duplication-suic |
| July 26, 2017, 1:03 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution andreysrkn: 1 on Another one-liner-suic |
| July 25, 2017, 10 a.m. | +3 | Experience for voted solution ViktorVx: 3 on One-liner-suic |
| July 12, 2017, 5:36 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution alex.stefanov2: 1 on One-liner variation-suic |
| July 11, 2017, 9:15 p.m. | +8 | Experience for solved mission Create Intervals |
| July 9, 2017, 7:25 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution vadya53: 2 on Another one-liner-suic |
| July 9, 2017, 7:30 a.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution gkyy20: 2 on One-liner-suic |
| June 29, 2017, 1:51 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment mirra008: 1 on suic: Hi, I have two comments: 1. `_calculate_beta_angle` is redundant as `_calculate_alpha_angle(b, a, c)... |
| June 29, 2017, 1:51 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment mirra008: 1 on suic: Hi, I have two comments: 1. `_calculate_beta_angle` is redundant as `_calculate_alpha_angle(b, a, c)... |
| June 27, 2017, 10:24 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution vlad.bezden: 2 on Less duplication-suic |
| June 27, 2017, 7:25 p.m. | +20 | Experience for solved mission Completely Empty |
| June 27, 2017, 7:21 p.m. | +15 | Experience for solved mission Reverse Roman Numerals |
| June 26, 2017, 7:38 p.m. | +6 | Experience for voted solution Rob019: 4 on One-liner-suic |
| June 23, 2017, 11:14 a.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment narumi.kano.3: 1 on suic: Hi, have at [_calendar.isleap()](https://docs.python.org/3/library/calendar.html?highlight=calendar.... |
| June 23, 2017, 11:14 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment narumi.kano.3: 1 on suic: Hi, have at [_calendar.isleap()](https://docs.python.org/3/library/calendar.html?highlight=calendar.... |
| June 22, 2017, 3:30 p.m. | +4 | Experience for voted solution hnguyen: 4 on One-liner-suic |
| June 21, 2017, 4:05 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted comment alphamikevictor: 1 on suic: Hi, read about short-circuiting behavior of `or` and `and` in Python [here](https://docs.python.org/... |
| June 21, 2017, 4:05 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment alphamikevictor: 1 on suic: Hi, read about short-circuiting behavior of `or` and `and` in Python [here](https://docs.python.org/... |
| June 14, 2017, 10 a.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution MrPod: 1 on One-liner-suic |
| May 19, 2017, 6:03 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment m_a_ge: 1 on suic: Hi, I like you solution except from it's repetitive nature, which you can avoid: base = "I"*data rs ... |
| May 18, 2017, 4:32 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted comment narimiran: 1 on suic: This is so funny :) 1. "all the magic" (including `itertools.groupby`) on one-line. 2. wrapped by a ... |
| May 14, 2017, 12:18 p.m. | +2 | Experience for voted solution afana_daniel: 2 on One-liner variation-suic |
| May 13, 2017, 10:15 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted solution Tinus_Trotyl: 1 on Encoded Primes-suic |
| May 13, 2017, 5 p.m. | +5 | Experience for appreciated comment lmab: 1 on suic: Hi, `map` object is iterable, therefore: ```python result = '+'.join(map(str, data)) # or even retur... |
| May 13, 2017, 5 p.m. | +1 | Experience for voted comment lmab: 1 on suic: Hi, `map` object is iterable, therefore: ```python result = '+'.join(map(str, data)) # or even retur... |
| May 13, 2017, 3:34 a.m. | +7 | Experience for voted solution Takafumi_Yamanobe: 1 on Sim0000's one-liner without if :)-suic |
| May 12, 2017, 10:28 p.m. | +5 | Experience for solved mission SendGrid Geo Stats |
| May 12, 2017, 10:20 p.m. | +5 | Experience for solved mission Welcome Email by SendGrid |
