Feb. 26, 2016, 8:28 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution mac12841: 2 on One-liner-suic |
Feb. 26, 2016, 3:57 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution zmantx: 2 on Shorter-suic |
Feb. 25, 2016, 10:38 p.m. |
+8 |
Experience for solved mission The Longest Palindromic |
Feb. 25, 2016, 9:26 p.m. |
+8 |
Experience for solved mission Currency Style |
Feb. 24, 2016, 12:06 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment Rita: 1 on suic: Hi, `bool` is a subclass of `int`, therefore the nested `if`s are redundant. |
Feb. 24, 2016, 12:06 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Rita: 1 on suic: Hi, `bool` is a subclass of `int`, therefore the nested `if`s are redundant. |
Feb. 23, 2016, 4:45 a.m. |
+4 |
Experience for voted solution aag.bronner: 2 on Shorter-suic |
Feb. 18, 2016, 4:16 a.m. |
+4 |
Experience for voted solution AsEsm: 2 on After refactoring-suic |
Feb. 17, 2016, 7:02 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution bbbass123: 1 on First-suic |
Feb. 16, 2016, 9:21 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution Evgeny_Kuizhev: 1 on One-liner-suic |
Feb. 12, 2016, 2:32 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment zdanik: 1 on suic: You don't need the if ... else at all: def checkio(array): return len(array) and sum(array[::2]) * a... |
Feb. 7, 2016, 11:14 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment joensuum: 1 on suic: Hi, from top to bottom left to right: # The first if checks if n_row are n_col are valid indices. # ... |
Feb. 5, 2016, 6:36 p.m. |
+3 |
Experience for voted solution gbajaj91: 2 on Recursion-suic |
Feb. 1, 2016, 2:34 p.m. |
+13 |
Experience for voted solution JMichaelis: 2 on First-suic |
Jan. 31, 2016, 10:16 a.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution ludek.reif: 2 on One-liner-suic |
Jan. 29, 2016, 5:59 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment edutilos: 1 on suic: Hi Alex, checkio.org changed my life, I'd be happy to contribute to future development. I think 2.99... |
Jan. 29, 2016, 5:59 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment edutilos: 1 on suic: Hi Alex, checkio.org changed my life, I'd be happy to contribute to future development. I think 2.99... |
Jan. 28, 2016, 4:24 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment marko_anton: 1 on suic: Hi Alex, checkio.org changed my life, I'd be happy to contribute to future development. I think 2.99... |
Jan. 28, 2016, 4:24 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment marko_anton: 1 on suic: Hi Alex, checkio.org changed my life, I'd be happy to contribute to future development. I think 2.99... |
Jan. 28, 2016, 1:06 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment oduvan: 1 on suic: Hi Alex, checkio.org changed my life, I'd be happy to contribute to future development. I think 2.99... |
Jan. 28, 2016, 1:06 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment oduvan: 1 on suic: Hi Alex, checkio.org changed my life, I'd be happy to contribute to future development. I think 2.99... |
Jan. 28, 2016, 10:33 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment dmralev: 1 on suic: Hi Alex, checkio.org changed my life, I'd be happy to contribute to future development. I think 2.99... |
Jan. 28, 2016, 10:33 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment dmralev: 1 on suic: Hi Alex, checkio.org changed my life, I'd be happy to contribute to future development. I think 2.99... |
Jan. 28, 2016, 9:51 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment krysa744: 1 on suic: Hi Alex, checkio.org changed my life, I'd be happy to contribute to future development. I think 2.99... |
Jan. 28, 2016, 9:51 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment krysa744: 1 on suic: Hi Alex, checkio.org changed my life, I'd be happy to contribute to future development. I think 2.99... |
Jan. 26, 2016, 8:41 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution Krischtopp: 1 on XOR-suic |
Jan. 18, 2016, 10:38 a.m. |
+3 |
Experience for voted solution impu1se: 2 on LeFree's shortened-suic |
Jan. 17, 2016, 10:47 a.m. |
+4 |
Experience for voted solution AlexPro: 1 on One-liner (py2.7)-suic |
Jan. 17, 2016, 8:39 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment d1skort: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. the last `if...else` is redundant. You could return your condition after some changes. 2. Tho... |
Jan. 17, 2016, 8:39 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment d1skort: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. the last `if...else` is redundant. You could return your condition after some changes. 2. Tho... |
Jan. 15, 2016, 1:08 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment edutilos: 1 on suic: Hi, you can get points without using any golfing trick, just by decreasing the indentation to 1 inst... |
Jan. 4, 2016, 12:24 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment bondIK95: 1 on suic: Can you please rate my comment (with little + and - next to the zero in comment header)? (I already ... |
Jan. 4, 2016, 12:24 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment bondIK95: 1 on suic: Can you please rate my comment (with little + and - next to the zero in comment header)? (I already ... |
Jan. 3, 2016, 2:17 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution Gondragos: 1 on Easy-suic |
Jan. 2, 2016, 11:48 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution Gondragos: 1 on One-liner-suic |
Jan. 2, 2016, 3:45 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution Gondragos: 1 on Another one-liner-suic |
Dec. 31, 2015, 8:16 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution MihaylovNikitos: 1 on First-suic |
Dec. 25, 2015, 4:19 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution Accent-: 1 on Shortened-suic |
Dec. 24, 2015, 10:37 p.m. |
+3 |
Experience for voted solution tivvit: 3 on One-liner variation-suic |
Dec. 23, 2015, 6:54 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Atiesh: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. `number` has to be an __int__. With _str()_ you convert it to __str__. You should check e. g.... |
Dec. 23, 2015, 6:54 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment Atiesh: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. `number` has to be an __int__. With _str()_ you convert it to __str__. You should check e. g.... |
Dec. 22, 2015, 11:58 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment ianverheyden: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. `number` has to be an __int__. With _str()_ you convert it to __str__. You should check e. g.... |
Dec. 22, 2015, 11:58 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment ianverheyden: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. `number` has to be an __int__. With _str()_ you convert it to __str__. You should check e. g.... |
Dec. 21, 2015, 9:51 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment jacynth.agraan: 1 on suic: Hi, _str.lower()_ is not an in-place operation: >>> text = "abcABC" >>> text.lower() 'abcabc' >>> te... |
Dec. 21, 2015, 9:51 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment jacynth.agraan: 1 on suic: Hi, _str.lower()_ is not an in-place operation: >>> text = "abcABC" >>> text.lower() 'abcabc' >>> te... |
Dec. 21, 2015, 6:09 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution rkosyk: 1 on XOR-suic |
Dec. 20, 2015, 11:43 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution mkopta: 1 on First-suic |
Dec. 19, 2015, 1:55 a.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution Kristof: 2 on Revisited KvaNTy's Straight and primitive-suic |
Dec. 16, 2015, 9:38 a.m. |
+3 |
Experience for voted solution sajkatav: 3 on One-liner variation-suic |
Dec. 10, 2015, 11:59 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment ggliukaz_9dbf6201a9d845e58bfc8: 1 on suic: Hi, from top to bottom left to right: # The first if checks if n_row are n_col are valid indices. # ... |
Dec. 7, 2015, 6:34 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment pasha.serikov: 1 on suic: Hi, from top to bottom left to right: # The first if checks if n_row are n_col are valid indices. # ... |
Nov. 28, 2015, 4:29 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment John.Hammell: 1 on suic: One more thing: As `words_set` is a __set__ you could write this: def checkio(words_set): for word i... |
Nov. 28, 2015, 4:29 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment John.Hammell: 1 on suic: One more thing: As `words_set` is a __set__ you could write this: def checkio(words_set): for word i... |
Nov. 28, 2015, 4:29 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment John.Hammell: 1 on suic: Hi, nice solution. I didn't know that _str.endswith()_ accepts a __tuple__. On the other hand it's a... |
Nov. 28, 2015, 4:29 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted comment John.Hammell: 1 on suic: Hi, nice solution. I didn't know that _str.endswith()_ accepts a __tuple__. On the other hand it's a... |
Nov. 27, 2015, 2:37 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment evgenyvik88: 1 on suic: I'm sorry guys. There's a typo. It should be: a valid index is 0 <= ind < len(array) |
Nov. 24, 2015, 5:36 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment tarjeii: 1 on suic: > CheckiO is hardly helpful as a teaching tool. I simply don't agree. |
Nov. 24, 2015, 3:29 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment ThrashAbaddon: 1 on suic: Hi, to choose one option is quite limiting, it would be better vote for multiple options. I would li... |
Nov. 23, 2015, 10:08 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution Earthlandto: 1 on One-liner variation-suic |
Nov. 19, 2015, 12:16 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Hayertjez: 1 on suic: Hi, `number` is redundant: return int(str_number, radix) |
Nov. 19, 2015, 12:16 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment Hayertjez: 1 on suic: Hi, `number` is redundant: return int(str_number, radix) |
Nov. 19, 2015, 12:15 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment Hayertjez: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. You could write `array[::2]` 2. and also use _sum()_ instead of for loop: return array[-1] * ... |
Nov. 19, 2015, 12:15 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Hayertjez: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. You could write `array[::2]` 2. and also use _sum()_ instead of for loop: return array[-1] * ... |
Nov. 18, 2015, 10:54 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Hayertjez: 1 on suic: Hi, 10 is the correct answer. Upon closer inspection: # result # | # V # In (5, 3, 2, 1, 0) there ar... |
Nov. 17, 2015, 12:12 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment lnyhome: 1 on suic: Hi, don't use `list.index`. It finds only the first index. That testcase contains 84 twice. |
Nov. 17, 2015, 12:12 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment lnyhome: 1 on suic: Hi, don't use `list.index`. It finds only the first index. That testcase contains 84 twice. |
Nov. 14, 2015, 2:53 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment boikailya: 1 on suic: Hi, the issue is that you don't call _str.is[upper/lower/digit]()_ methods. To call a method/functio... |
Nov. 14, 2015, 2:53 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment boikailya: 1 on suic: Hi, the issue is that you don't call _str.is[upper/lower/digit]()_ methods. To call a method/functio... |
Nov. 8, 2015, 11:42 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment soma115: 1 on suic: Hi, from top to bottom left to right: # The first if checks if n_row are n_col are valid indices. # ... |
Nov. 6, 2015, 1:32 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution Benjamin.michelland: 1 on One-liner variation-suic |
Nov. 6, 2015, 10:54 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment ermichin158: 1 on suic: Hi, to choose one option is quite limiting, it would be better vote for multiple options. I would li... |
Nov. 5, 2015, 9:26 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, you're right. In Python 3 it's a bit more tricky, because _zip()_ returns a __zip__ object, whic... |
Nov. 5, 2015, 9:26 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, you're right. In Python 3 it's a bit more tricky, because _zip()_ returns a __zip__ object, whic... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:27 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, you could shorten this and eliminate one branch: if word != word1 and word1.endswith(word): retu... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:27 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, you could shorten this and eliminate one branch: if word != word1 and word1.endswith(word): retu... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:26 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, nice solution. Look at [_functools.reduce()_](https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/functools.html... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:26 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, nice solution. Look at [_functools.reduce()_](https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/functools.html... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:26 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, when you have the following pattern: if condition: continue else: do_something is better to rewr... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:26 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, when you have the following pattern: if condition: continue else: do_something is better to rewr... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:24 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. `else` on line 4 is redundant. 2. _any()_ returns a __bool__ so you could write: if len(data)... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:24 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. `else` on line 4 is redundant. 2. _any()_ returns a __bool__ so you could write: if len(data)... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:23 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, `l` is redundant as _min()_ accepts an _iterable_. You could write this: return min(x for x, y i... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:23 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, `l` is redundant as _min()_ accepts an _iterable_. You could write this: return min(x for x, y i... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:22 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. _bin()_ returns a __str__, therefore _str()_ is redundant. 2. There's the [_str.count()_](htt... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:22 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. _bin()_ returns a __str__, therefore _str()_ is redundant. 2. There's the [_str.count()_](htt... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:21 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, the built-in [__set__](https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/stdtypes.html?highlight=str.count#set... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:21 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, the built-in [__set__](https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/stdtypes.html?highlight=str.count#set... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:19 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, there's a worth-to-learn trick for doing this in Python: `zip(*data)` :) Btw. `new` is redundant... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:19 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, there's a worth-to-learn trick for doing this in Python: `zip(*data)` :) Btw. `new` is redundant... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:19 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. `x` is already an __int__ therefore _int()__ is redundant. 2. _abs()_ is a function and `key`... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:19 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. `x` is already an __int__ therefore _int()__ is redundant. 2. _abs()_ is a function and `key`... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:18 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, look at [bitwise exclusive or operator](https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/stdtypes.html?highli... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 6:18 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment inga.s: 1 on suic: Hi, look at [bitwise exclusive or operator](https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/stdtypes.html?highli... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 11:53 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment ermichin158: 1 on suic: Hi, in Python you can write this: a, b, c = args |
Nov. 4, 2015, 11:53 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment ermichin158: 1 on suic: Hi, in Python you can write this: a, b, c = args |
Nov. 4, 2015, 11:52 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment ermichin158: 1 on suic: Hi, you could clean it up a bit. E. g.: 1. Remove the print statements 2. int(a, 10) == int(a) so yo... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 11:52 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment ermichin158: 1 on suic: Hi, you could clean it up a bit. E. g.: 1. Remove the print statements 2. int(a, 10) == int(a) so yo... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 10:34 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment ermichin158: 1 on suic: Hi, use a _mutable type_, functions like _filter()_ or _map()_ or _list comprehension/generator expr... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 10:34 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment ermichin158: 1 on suic: Hi, use a _mutable type_, functions like _filter()_ or _map()_ or _list comprehension/generator expr... |
Nov. 4, 2015, 9:39 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment ermichin158: 1 on suic: Hi, `listToString` is reinventing the wheel. Look at [_str.join_](https://docs.python.org/3.5/librar... |