March 1, 2015, 3:58 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment CraigFranklin: 1 on suic: Hi, let me have some comments: You don't need: 1. the else branches at all. 2. "== True" as test is ... |
March 1, 2015, 3:56 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment CraigFranklin: 1 on suic: Hi, this is "overparenthesized" :D # E. g.: bin_n = bin(n)[2::][::-1] bin_m = bin(m)[2::][::-1] + di... |
March 1, 2015, 3:56 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment CraigFranklin: 1 on suic: Hi, this is "overparenthesized" :D # E. g.: bin_n = bin(n)[2::][::-1] bin_m = bin(m)[2::][::-1] + di... |
March 1, 2015, 3:54 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment CraigFranklin: 1 on suic: Hi, look at documentation for _sorted()_. Sorted has _key_ argument, which is quite useful. |
March 1, 2015, 3:54 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment CraigFranklin: 1 on suic: Hi, look at documentation for _sorted()_. Sorted has _key_ argument, which is quite useful. |
March 1, 2015, 3:53 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment CraigFranklin: 1 on suic: Hi, parentheses around bin(number) are redundant. |
March 1, 2015, 3:53 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment CraigFranklin: 1 on suic: Hi, parentheses around bin(number) are redundant. |
March 1, 2015, 3:52 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment CraigFranklin: 1 on suic: Hi, you don't need _alph_: for i in string.ascii_lowercase: ... |
March 1, 2015, 3:52 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment CraigFranklin: 1 on suic: Hi, you don't need _alph_: for i in string.ascii_lowercase: ... |
March 1, 2015, 12:12 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment AmaroVita: 1 on suic: Hi, read the description: __compiled size__ matters :) |
March 1, 2015, 12:12 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment AmaroVita: 1 on suic: Hi, read the description: __compiled size__ matters :) |
Feb. 27, 2015, 10:11 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment lllz: 1 on suic: Hi, maybe it's a bit off topic but a very good (but maybe a bit outdated) resource for Python is _Py... |
Feb. 27, 2015, 7:13 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution boris.uvarov: 1 on First-suic |
Feb. 27, 2015, 3:09 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment AmaroVita: 1 on suic: Hi, parentheses around ",".join(phrases) are redundant. |
Feb. 27, 2015, 3:09 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment AmaroVita: 1 on suic: Hi, parentheses around ",".join(phrases) are redundant. |
Feb. 27, 2015, 3:09 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment AmaroVita: 1 on suic: Hi, you could write r+=['Buzz'] or better r.append('Buzz'). |
Feb. 27, 2015, 3:09 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment AmaroVita: 1 on suic: Hi, you could write r+=['Buzz'] or better r.append('Buzz'). |
Feb. 27, 2015, 3:04 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment AmaroVita: 1 on suic: Hi, in "".join() the [] are redundant. |
Feb. 27, 2015, 3:04 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment AmaroVita: 1 on suic: Hi, in "".join() the [] are redundant. |
Feb. 27, 2015, 2:32 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution nsmirnoff: 1 on One-liner variation-suic |
Feb. 27, 2015, 12:34 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment OMFGNuts: 1 on suic: Hi, maybe it's a bit off topic but a very good (but maybe a bit outdated) resource for Python is _Py... |
Feb. 27, 2015, 9 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment andray.smb: 1 on suic: Hi, frankly I'm not good in regexes and I usually don't use them. What I tried to say was, that you ... |
Feb. 27, 2015, 9 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment andray.smb: 1 on suic: Hi, frankly I'm not good in regexes and I usually don't use them. What I tried to say was, that you ... |
Feb. 27, 2015, 8:40 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment OMFGNuts: 1 on suic: Hi, read the description and see the examples (there's also a Russian description): > Для пустого ма... |
Feb. 26, 2015, 10:30 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment lukas.linhart: 1 on suic: Hi, look at the documentation for [_sorted_](https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html?highli... |
Feb. 26, 2015, 10:30 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment lukas.linhart: 1 on suic: Hi, look at the documentation for [_sorted_](https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html?highli... |
Feb. 26, 2015, 10:30 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment lukas.linhart: 1 on suic: Hi, you could use: int.__mul__ # instead of: lambda x, y: x * y |
Feb. 26, 2015, 10:30 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment lukas.linhart: 1 on suic: Hi, you could use: int.__mul__ # instead of: lambda x, y: x * y |
Feb. 26, 2015, 10:29 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment lukas.linhart: 1 on suic: Hi, look at [this](https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html?highlight=str.isupper#truth-value... |
Feb. 26, 2015, 10:29 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment lukas.linhart: 1 on suic: Hi, look at [this](https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html?highlight=str.isupper#truth-value... |
Feb. 26, 2015, 10:29 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment lukas.linhart: 1 on suic: Hi, I have a few comments: 1. You don't need _re_ as __str__ has _str.replace()_ method. 2. When you... |
Feb. 26, 2015, 10:29 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment lukas.linhart: 1 on suic: Hi, I have a few comments: 1. You don't need _re_ as __str__ has _str.replace()_ method. 2. When you... |
Feb. 26, 2015, 10:29 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment lukas.linhart: 1 on suic: Hi, look at _str.isupper()_. |
Feb. 26, 2015, 10:29 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment lukas.linhart: 1 on suic: Hi, look at _str.isupper()_. |
Feb. 26, 2015, 10:27 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment lukas.linhart: 1 on suic: Hi, you can unpack iterables with *: d1 = date(*date1) |
Feb. 26, 2015, 10:27 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment lukas.linhart: 1 on suic: Hi, you can unpack iterables with *: d1 = date(*date1) |
Feb. 26, 2015, 8:56 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment AlexGiesbrecht: 1 on suic: Hi _rv_ is reduntant. You can directly return the value on lines 6 and 8. |
Feb. 26, 2015, 8:56 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment AlexGiesbrecht: 1 on suic: Hi _rv_ is reduntant. You can directly return the value on lines 6 and 8. |
Feb. 26, 2015, 8:50 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment AlexGiesbrecht: 1 on suic: Hi, this is quite repetitive. Let make some comments: 1. _length_ is redundant. Once the length of d... |
Feb. 26, 2015, 8:50 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment AlexGiesbrecht: 1 on suic: Hi, this is quite repetitive. Let make some comments: 1. _length_ is redundant. Once the length of d... |
Feb. 25, 2015, 1:05 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment mariacl: 1 on suic: Hi, [here](http://www.checkio.org/mission/house-password/publications/suic/python-3/one-liner-variat... |
Feb. 25, 2015, 1:05 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment mariacl: 1 on suic: Hi, [here](http://www.checkio.org/mission/house-password/publications/suic/python-3/one-liner-variat... |
Feb. 25, 2015, 12:11 p.m. |
+4 |
Experience for voted solution tarasenkoa: 2 on Tarasenkoa's as one-liner-suic |
Feb. 24, 2015, 7:05 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution mariacl: 1 on One-liner variation-suic |
Feb. 22, 2015, 10:05 p.m. |
+7 |
Experience for voted solution veky: 2 on First-suic |
Feb. 22, 2015, 9:32 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution polly: 1 on Recursion-suic |
Feb. 22, 2015, 9:48 a.m. |
+4 |
Experience for voted solution veky: 2 on One-liner-suic |
Feb. 22, 2015, 9:48 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment veky: 1 on suic: Hi, because of Chinese characters: 1. normalize('NFKD', i) returns the Chinese characters _without c... |
Feb. 22, 2015, 9:07 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment OMFGNuts: 1 on suic: Hi, from top to bottom left to right: # The first if checks if n_row are n_col are valid indices. # ... |
Feb. 21, 2015, 10:11 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution abe.dillon: 1 on Simple-suic |
Feb. 21, 2015, 1:39 p.m. |
+7 |
Experience for voted solution bryukh: 1 on First-suic |
Feb. 21, 2015, 8:25 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment andray.smb: 1 on suic: Hi, from top to bottom left to right: # The first if checks if n_row are n_col are valid indices. # ... |
Feb. 20, 2015, 9:15 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment giolefpaceid: 1 on suic: Hi, look at _str.isupper_. |
Feb. 20, 2015, 9:15 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment giolefpaceid: 1 on suic: Hi, look at _str.isupper_. |
Feb. 19, 2015, 3:32 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Sim0000: 1 on suic: Hi, I'm not the author of that mission, but I would say: The point is, that you should make _your ow... |
Feb. 18, 2015, 7:10 p.m. |
+10 |
Experience for voted solution KvaNTy: 3 on Revisited KvaNTy's Straight and primitive-suic |
Feb. 18, 2015, 2:55 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution Another_Chris: 1 on First-suic |
Feb. 17, 2015, 4:20 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment CRiquelme: 1 on suic: Hi, > Hello I have a problem when _I try to return Empty_ Let me ask: Why? What do you mean by _Empt... |
Feb. 17, 2015, 4:20 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment CRiquelme: 1 on suic: Hi, > Hello I have a problem when _I try to return Empty_ Let me ask: Why? What do you mean by _Empt... |
Feb. 17, 2015, 1:48 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution bunchhieng: 1 on One-liner variation-suic |
Feb. 17, 2015, 1:14 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment veky: 1 on suic: ... it was rhetorical :) |
Feb. 16, 2015, 7:36 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment Rao: 1 on suic: Hi, when you return the same thing from two branches you don't need two branches. |
Feb. 16, 2015, 7:36 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Rao: 1 on suic: Hi, when you return the same thing from two branches you don't need two branches. |
Feb. 16, 2015, 3:41 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment kamitenshi: 1 on suic: Hi, you can't do it that way and the point is not the sorting. Look at this: def verify_anagrams(fir... |
Feb. 16, 2015, 3:41 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment kamitenshi: 1 on suic: Hi, you can't do it that way and the point is not the sorting. Look at this: def verify_anagrams(fir... |
Feb. 16, 2015, 3:41 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment kamitenshi: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. Notice that you do many steps twice. 2. The last if is unnecessary: return liste1 == liste2 |
Feb. 16, 2015, 3:41 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment kamitenshi: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. Notice that you do many steps twice. 2. The last if is unnecessary: return liste1 == liste2 |
Feb. 16, 2015, 12:53 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution mandalorx: 1 on Shortened-suic |
Feb. 16, 2015, 12:52 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution mandalorx: 1 on First-suic |
Feb. 15, 2015, 11:31 p.m. |
+18 |
Experience for voted solution wujie: 2 on First-suic |
Feb. 13, 2015, 10:26 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment CommaWhite: 1 on suic: Hi, your code has to be __inside__ a function called _checkio_, like this: def checkio(array): In yo... |
Feb. 13, 2015, 10:26 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment CommaWhite: 1 on suic: Hi, your code has to be __inside__ a function called _checkio_, like this: def checkio(array): In yo... |
Feb. 12, 2015, 3:16 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment schanjr: 1 on suic: Hi, bin() returns __str__, which has _str.count_ method, so you could write: return bin(number).coun... |
Feb. 12, 2015, 3:16 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment schanjr: 1 on suic: Hi, bin() returns __str__, which has _str.count_ method, so you could write: return bin(number).coun... |
Feb. 11, 2015, 7:21 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment vbereznyuk: 1 on suic: Hi, # Instead of this: if len(queue) == 0: continue queue.pop(0) # you could write this: if queue: q... |
Feb. 11, 2015, 7:21 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment vbereznyuk: 1 on suic: Hi, # Instead of this: if len(queue) == 0: continue queue.pop(0) # you could write this: if queue: q... |
Feb. 11, 2015, 7:16 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment vbereznyuk: 1 on suic: Hi, when you first join the phrases, you can replace the words all at once: return ",".join(phrases)... |
Feb. 11, 2015, 7:16 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment vbereznyuk: 1 on suic: Hi, when you first join the phrases, you can replace the words all at once: return ",".join(phrases)... |
Feb. 11, 2015, 7:15 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment vbereznyuk: 1 on suic: Hi, as you don't use the index here: for index, value_b in enumerate(sequence[index:]): # you can wr... |
Feb. 11, 2015, 7:15 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment vbereznyuk: 1 on suic: Hi, as you don't use the index here: for index, value_b in enumerate(sequence[index:]): # you can wr... |
Feb. 11, 2015, 6:56 p.m. |
-1 |
Experience for voted comment BossRaker: -1 on suic: Hi, 30 minutes... hmmmm... It's a shame that there's no _Obfuscated_ category in checkio. |
Feb. 11, 2015, 6:34 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment tofol: 1 on suic: Hi, at first sight I was a bit surprised that it works :) as __is__ isn't the right comparison in th... |
Feb. 11, 2015, 6:34 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment tofol: 1 on suic: Hi, at first sight I was a bit surprised that it works :) as __is__ isn't the right comparison in th... |
Feb. 11, 2015, 12:30 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment gileadslostson: 1 on suic: Hi, I see that this is an older solution, but let me have some comments. I understand your approach ... |
Feb. 11, 2015, 12:30 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment gileadslostson: 1 on suic: Hi, I see that this is an older solution, but let me have some comments. I understand your approach ... |
Feb. 11, 2015, 12:29 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment gileadslostson: 1 on suic: Hi, you could write: t1, t2 = map(int, time.split(":")) instead of line 2-4. |
Feb. 11, 2015, 12:29 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment gileadslostson: 1 on suic: Hi, you could write: t1, t2 = map(int, time.split(":")) instead of line 2-4. |
Feb. 10, 2015, 8:16 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment spoty: 1 on suic: Hi, this looks better. But there is still three times the same pattern, which you could eliminate e.... |
Feb. 10, 2015, 8:16 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment spoty: 1 on suic: Hi, this looks better. But there is still three times the same pattern, which you could eliminate e.... |
Feb. 10, 2015, 6:18 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment yoichi: 1 on suic: Hi, this looks better. But there is still three times the same pattern, which you could eliminate e.... |
Feb. 10, 2015, 6:18 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment yoichi: 1 on suic: Hi, this looks better. But there is still three times the same pattern, which you could eliminate e.... |
Feb. 10, 2015, 4:35 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for solved mission Even the Last |
Feb. 10, 2015, 4:33 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment nkapliev: 1 on suic: Hi, I have a few comments: 1. You can omit the if ... else. return sum(map(lambda word: word in text... |
Feb. 10, 2015, 4:33 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment nkapliev: 1 on suic: Hi, I have a few comments: 1. You can omit the if ... else. return sum(map(lambda word: word in text... |
Feb. 10, 2015, 4:29 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution yoichi: 1 on A redundant 0 removed :)-suic |
Feb. 10, 2015, 4:24 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment zebulan: 1 on suic: Hi, you could use lambda and \_\_import\_\_() to make it one-line-one-liner :) |
Feb. 10, 2015, 4:24 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment zebulan: 1 on suic: Hi, you could use lambda and \_\_import\_\_() to make it one-line-one-liner :) |
Feb. 10, 2015, 4:23 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment zebulan: 1 on suic: Hi, zip_longest... nice :) I have two comments: 1. Look at bin() together with the ^ operator. 2. Yo... |
Feb. 10, 2015, 4:23 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment zebulan: 1 on suic: Hi, zip_longest... nice :) I have two comments: 1. Look at bin() together with the ^ operator. 2. Yo... |
Feb. 10, 2015, 4:23 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment zebulan: 1 on suic: Hi zebulan, if you like (or don't like :)) my comments, can you please rate them with small + or - n... |