May 12, 2017, 6:03 p.m. |
+20 |
Experience for solved mission Painting Wall |
May 12, 2017, 5:58 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment DahliaSR: 1 on suic: Hi, it's better to avoid complex lambdas in `reduce`. Regards, suic ```python # instead of if len(st... |
May 11, 2017, 3:06 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for voted solution Garfield: 2 on Py2.7 one-liner using cmp()-suic |
May 11, 2017, 9:22 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for voted solution druifor: 3 on druifor's "Exp: sets & combinations" shortened :)-suic |
May 11, 2017, 9:22 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment druifor: 1 on suic: Hi, druifor. I've played a bit more with your solution. [Here](https://py.checkio.org/mission/the-sq... |
May 11, 2017, 9:22 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment druifor: 1 on suic: Hi, druifor. I've played a bit more with your solution. [Here](https://py.checkio.org/mission/the-sq... |
May 11, 2017, 4:54 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment druifor: 1 on suic: Hi, using Pythonic way of iterating over an iterable `for element in seq:` in combination with `iter... |
May 11, 2017, 4:54 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment druifor: 1 on suic: Hi, using Pythonic way of iterating over an iterable `for element in seq:` in combination with `iter... |
May 10, 2017, 12:31 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment titaneric: 1 on suic: Hi, this can be made more compact with `filter`: return "".join(filter(str.isupper, text)) Regards, ... |
May 10, 2017, 12:31 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment titaneric: 1 on suic: Hi, this can be made more compact with `filter`: return "".join(filter(str.isupper, text)) Regards, ... |
May 10, 2017, 12:31 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment titaneric: 1 on suic: Hi, look at [extended slices](https://docs.python.org/2/whatsnew/2.3.html#extended-slices): ```pytho... |
May 10, 2017, 12:31 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment titaneric: 1 on suic: Hi, look at [extended slices](https://docs.python.org/2/whatsnew/2.3.html#extended-slices): ```pytho... |
May 10, 2017, 12:30 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment titaneric: 1 on suic: Hi, `[2:]` is redundant as `bin()` returns a string in `0x...`. Regards, suic |
May 10, 2017, 12:30 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment titaneric: 1 on suic: Hi, `[2:]` is redundant as `bin()` returns a string in `0x...`. Regards, suic |
May 10, 2017, 12:30 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment titaneric: 1 on suic: Hi, ```python # bool # /-------------------\ True if len(set(sub[i])) == 1 else False # is the same ... |
May 10, 2017, 12:30 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment titaneric: 1 on suic: Hi, ```python # bool # /-------------------\ True if len(set(sub[i])) == 1 else False # is the same ... |
May 10, 2017, 12:30 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment titaneric: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. `list` isn't a good object good object for representing queues as `lst.pop(0)` is `O(n)` (see... |
May 10, 2017, 12:30 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment titaneric: 1 on suic: Hi, 1. `list` isn't a good object good object for representing queues as `lst.pop(0)` is `O(n)` (see... |
May 9, 2017, 5:03 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment druifor: 1 on suic: Hi, `sorted()` accepts any iterable and `str` iterable so this is enough: return sorted(first.replac... |
May 9, 2017, 5:03 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment druifor: 1 on suic: Hi, `sorted()` accepts any iterable and `str` iterable so this is enough: return sorted(first.replac... |
May 8, 2017, 7:50 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment Tinus_Trotyl: 1 on suic: Hi, below is a more compact version using Python built-ins and idioms. Regards, suic ```python def i... |
May 8, 2017, 7:50 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted comment Tinus_Trotyl: 1 on suic: Hi, below is a more compact version using Python built-ins and idioms. Regards, suic ```python def i... |
May 8, 2017, 2:43 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment aquazul: 1 on suic: Actually this only checks if the type is `int`: ```python >>> type(1.0) == (int or float) False >>> ... |
May 7, 2017, 4:08 p.m. |
+4 |
Experience for voted solution narimiran: 2 on Simple without re-suic |
May 7, 2017, 3:39 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment narimiran: 1 on suic: Update: `iter()` is redundant too :) |
May 7, 2017, 3:39 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment narimiran: 1 on suic: Update: `iter()` is redundant too :) |
May 7, 2017, 10:12 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment Sim0000: 1 on suic: Hi, read about short-circuiting behavior of `or` and `and` in Python [here](https://docs.python.org/... |
May 7, 2017, 10:12 a.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted comment Sim0000: 1 on suic: Hi, read about short-circuiting behavior of `or` and `and` in Python [here](https://docs.python.org/... |
May 7, 2017, 1:02 a.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted comment kurosawa4434: 1 on suic: Hi, as `any` returns a `bool`: return any(search(reg, subj) for reg in stress_regs) Regards, suic |
May 7, 2017, 1:02 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment kurosawa4434: 1 on suic: Hi, as `any` returns a `bool`: return any(search(reg, subj) for reg in stress_regs) Regards, suic |
May 6, 2017, 4:54 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment narimiran: 1 on suic: Hi, as `any` returns a `bool`: return any(search(reg, subj) for reg in stress_regs) Regards, suic |
May 6, 2017, 4:54 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted comment narimiran: 1 on suic: Hi, as `any` returns a `bool`: return any(search(reg, subj) for reg in stress_regs) Regards, suic |
May 6, 2017, 3:16 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment narimiran: 1 on suic: Hi, two comments: 1. You could "precompile" the regexes and used the compiled version in `re.search`... |
May 6, 2017, 3:16 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted comment narimiran: 1 on suic: Hi, two comments: 1. You could "precompile" the regexes and used the compiled version in `re.search`... |
May 3, 2017, 3:13 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment narimiran: 1 on suic: 5. Optionally, you can use short-circuiting instead of if: ```python checkio = lambda a: len(a) and ... |
May 3, 2017, 2:30 p.m. |
+8 |
Experience for solved mission Stressful Subject |
April 26, 2017, 7:59 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution mpavlyuk: 1 on One-liner-suic |
April 18, 2017, 8:16 p.m. |
+4 |
Experience for voted solution dimsharav: 2 on One-liner-suic |
April 17, 2017, 4:49 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment Sim0000: 1 on suic: What about `is not None`? :) P. S.: Not becasue of PEP8 :) |
April 17, 2017, 4:49 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Sim0000: 1 on suic: What about `is not None`? :) P. S.: Not becasue of PEP8 :) |
April 16, 2017, 3:53 p.m. |
+20 |
Experience for solved mission Power Supply |
April 16, 2017, 1:59 p.m. |
+15 |
Experience for solved mission New Cities |
April 15, 2017, 7 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution deusdeus: 1 on One-liner-suic |
April 13, 2017, 4:49 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for voted solution jerz: 3 on Recursive one-liner-suic |
April 11, 2017, 7:54 p.m. |
+8 |
Experience for voted solution mirra008: 2 on Py2.7 one-liner using cmp()-suic |
April 7, 2017, 9:27 p.m. |
+20 |
Experience for solved mission Node Disconnected Users |
April 4, 2017, 5:26 a.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution bochoikr: 1 on One-liner (py2.7)-suic |
March 30, 2017, 7:05 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution d.f: 1 on One-liner variation-suic |
March 28, 2017, 10:19 p.m. |
+8 |
Experience for solved mission Largest Rectangle in a Histogram |
March 27, 2017, 11:11 p.m. |
+20 |
Experience for solved mission What Is Wrong With This Family? |
March 25, 2017, 6:52 p.m. |
+3 |
Experience for voted solution Nikolay_Ryagin: 3 on Refactored-suic |
March 24, 2017, 4:56 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Khoa_Pham_Dang: 1 on suic: Hi, to choose one option is quite limiting, it would be better vote for multiple options. I would li... |
March 11, 2017, 12:06 a.m. |
-1 |
Experience for voted comment pp3: -1 on suic: Hi DiZ, > When it comes to pure maths/theory, CheckiO is not the first site I have in mind Can you g... |
March 11, 2017, 12:06 a.m. |
-1 |
Experience for voted comment pp3: -1 on suic: Hi, to choose one option is quite limiting, it would be better vote for multiple options. I would li... |
March 7, 2017, 9:35 p.m. |
+3 |
Experience for voted solution hnguyen: 3 on First-suic |
March 1, 2017, 9:37 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution pablo-a: 1 on One-liner (py2.7)-suic |
Feb. 27, 2017, 5:32 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment zidansilverlane: 1 on suic: Hi, I like you solution except from it's repetitive nature, which you can avoid: base = "I"*data rs ... |
Feb. 16, 2017, 7:23 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution v6am32: 1 on One-liner-suic |
Feb. 12, 2017, 7:18 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment oduvan: 1 on suic: Hi, nice one. You can write it like this: ```python verify_anagrams = lambda *a: list.__eq__(*map(f,... |
Feb. 12, 2017, 7:18 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment oduvan: 1 on suic: Hi, nice one. You can write it like this: ```python verify_anagrams = lambda *a: list.__eq__(*map(f,... |
Feb. 12, 2017, 9:56 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment przemyslaw.daniel: 1 on suic: Hi, nice one. You can write it like this: ```python verify_anagrams = lambda *a: list.__eq__(*map(f,... |
Feb. 12, 2017, 9:56 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment przemyslaw.daniel: 1 on suic: Hi, nice one. You can write it like this: ```python verify_anagrams = lambda *a: list.__eq__(*map(f,... |
Jan. 14, 2017, 9:11 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution andreaszxc13: 1 on One-liner-suic |
Jan. 3, 2017, 4:57 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution Arachnivore: 1 on One-liner variation-suic |
Jan. 1, 2017, 7:50 p.m. |
+3 |
Experience for voted solution oduvan: 3 on or lambda-suic |
Jan. 1, 2017, 7:47 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment oduvan: 1 on suic: Hi, check [this](https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#truth-value-testing) and [this](htt... |
Dec. 30, 2016, 9:01 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution grafoff116: 2 on One-liner-suic |
Dec. 29, 2016, 3:49 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment atheos: 1 on suic: Hi, few things: 1. Commenting obvious things isn't a good practice. 2. `str` is iterable so there's ... |
Dec. 29, 2016, 3:49 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment atheos: 1 on suic: Hi, few things: 1. Commenting obvious things isn't a good practice. 2. `str` is iterable so there's ... |
Dec. 29, 2016, 10:34 a.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment oduvan: 1 on suic: Hi, few things: 1. Commenting obvious things isn't a good practice. 2. `str` is iterable so there's ... |
Dec. 29, 2016, 10:34 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment oduvan: 1 on suic: Hi, few things: 1. Commenting obvious things isn't a good practice. 2. `str` is iterable so there's ... |
Dec. 28, 2016, 7:14 a.m. |
+3 |
Experience for voted solution daik_: 3 on First-suic |
Dec. 27, 2016, 3:34 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment oduvan: 1 on suic: Thanks! F..ck ... what a stupid mistake. ([Fix](https://github.com/suic86/checkio-mission-most-frequ... |
Dec. 26, 2016, 1:28 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment mike-weinberg: 1 on suic: Hi, I like you solution except from it's repetitive nature, which you can avoid: base = "I"*data rs ... |
Dec. 22, 2016, 1:15 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Rita: 1 on suic: Hi, `else` is redundant. You could write: return sorted... return [0, 0, 0] |
Dec. 22, 2016, 1:15 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment Rita: 1 on suic: Hi, `else` is redundant. You could write: return sorted... return [0, 0, 0] |
Dec. 22, 2016, 2:32 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution pranklantern: 1 on One-liner-suic |
Dec. 21, 2016, 5:39 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Sim0000: 1 on suic: Hi, check [F.A.Q](https://py.checkio.org/forum/post/3269/6-the-most-common-mistakes/). Regards, suic |
Dec. 21, 2016, 4:35 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Sim0000: 1 on suic: Thanks for reporting. The root cause is explained [here](https://py.checkio.org/forum/post/10552/add... |
Dec. 20, 2016, 8:24 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Sim0000: 1 on suic: Thanks! F..ck ... what a stupid mistake. ([Fix](https://github.com/suic86/checkio-mission-most-frequ... |
Dec. 20, 2016, 5:58 a.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Sim0000: 1 on suic: @mu330: Many thanks. I've just committed the [change](https://github.com/suic86/checkio-mission-most... |
Dec. 19, 2016, 5:20 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted comment Sim0000: 1 on suic: Thanks, this is a valid point. I'll fix it soon. Regards, suic |
Dec. 13, 2016, 8:38 p.m. |
+4 |
Experience for voted solution logan.smith.5: 4 on First-suic |
Dec. 10, 2016, 1:18 p.m. |
+17 |
Experience for voted solution Alex_Bw: 3 on Using string formatting-suic |
Dec. 8, 2016, 11:52 p.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution DerryK: 1 on Cheating :)-suic |
Dec. 8, 2016, 2:21 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution ToKraTheSecond: 1 on One-liner variation-suic |
Dec. 5, 2016, 5:57 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution andreroukema: 1 on One-liner-suic |
Dec. 5, 2016, 4:05 a.m. |
+3 |
Experience for voted solution ForeverYoung: 3 on Ceph's Refactored-suic |
Nov. 29, 2016, 2:32 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution alexandre.richard.work: 1 on or lambda-suic |
Nov. 29, 2016, 7:44 a.m. |
+2 |
Experience for voted solution roman.breslav: 1 on or lambda-suic |
Nov. 25, 2016, 1:42 p.m. |
+1 |
Experience for voted solution escotia: 1 on First-suic |
Nov. 24, 2016, 3:15 p.m. |
-1 |
Experience for voted comment DaddyCringeMeister: -1 on suic: @@alf2: What is wrong with this comment? Why -1? |
Nov. 24, 2016, 3:15 p.m. |
-1 |
Experience for voted comment DaddyCringeMeister: -1 on suic: Hi, I know about both. _HackerRank_ is fine but annoying and I'm not a fun of _Top Coder_... and I'm... |
Nov. 24, 2016, 3:15 p.m. |
-1 |
Experience for voted comment DaddyCringeMeister: -1 on suic: Hi, thanks. I've heard about _Code Eval_ and solved some of the _Project Euler_ problems, but I've n... |
Nov. 24, 2016, 3:15 p.m. |
+5 |
Experience for appreciated comment DaddyCringeMeister: -1 on suic: Hi, thanks. I've heard about _Code Eval_ and solved some of the _Project Euler_ problems, but I've n... |
Nov. 24, 2016, 3:14 p.m. |
-1 |
Experience for voted comment DaddyCringeMeister: -1 on suic: Hi DiZ, > When it comes to pure maths/theory, CheckiO is not the first site I have in mind Can you g... |
Nov. 24, 2016, 3:14 p.m. |
-1 |
Experience for voted comment DaddyCringeMeister: -1 on suic: Thanks |
Nov. 24, 2016, 3:14 p.m. |
-1 |
Experience for voted comment DaddyCringeMeister: -1 on suic: Hi @OMFGNuts, could you make this thread "sticky"? Thanks, suic |
Nov. 24, 2016, 3:14 p.m. |
-1 |
Experience for voted comment DaddyCringeMeister: -1 on suic: Note: Can you make this thread "sticky" (like "F.A.Q" or "About tests and heavy data"). Thanks, suic |
Nov. 24, 2016, 3:14 p.m. |
-1 |
Experience for voted comment DaddyCringeMeister: -1 on suic: Hi, to choose one option is quite limiting, it would be better vote for multiple options. I would li... |